Obama makes Nixon look like a saint."
Democrats have had two Presidents to be impeached(the word means to formally accuse for those who don't know) yet not one of the two was removed from Office. Andrew Johnson finished out his term and Bill Clinton finished his term. Yet Republicans have the distinction of being the only ones where a President was not assassinated or physically injured but had to RESIGN FROM OFFICE SO HE WOULDN'T FACE IMPEACHMENT. From the time of Nixon they have been looking to even the score. Well, guess what? Not now, not in two years(even if somehow you manage to get control of the House and Senate) will you GET YOUR SHOT AT BARACK OBAMA. SO SUCK IT UP TEABAGGERS, NUTJOBS AND THE REST. IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES YOU SCREAM BENGHAZI, IRS, AND WHATEVER OTHER SICK PLOT YOU COME UP WITH. HE'S THERE AND YOU CAN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. GET A LIFE.
Ibeshamed: do you know what a tea bragger is?"
No, but the ones who call themselves MEMBERS OF THE TEA PARTY CAN CREDIT THEIR "INGENIOUS" USE OF TEA BAGS CLIPPED TO THEIR HATS FOR THEIR NAME OF TEABAGGERS.
You see, ibshame, actually BO and Putin are very much alike"
Sorry, but when teabaggers make talking points like the ones you have listed your credibility goes out the window. Your kind of rhetoric only appeals to low-information voters.
Scripture, God's word, tells us that He created man and woman on His 6th day ( a 24 hour day) of creation. He created them fully grown, thus there was NO evolution involved, NONE!
No evolutionist has ever proved nor ever will prove otherwise.
That apish depiction of man by Mr. Bennett is wrong and pure blasphemy."
You really should just give it up. Your arguments have been weak, after all ikeithlu and the rest have written, their arguments have been clearer and more logical than anything you have written thus far. IF one didn't believe in Evolution they would now at least consider the possibility based on their arguments and not yours.
White guilt elected BHO. Blessings be upon him. The man was, and is, incompetent"
Someone like you would like to think that. Incompetent? Said the teabagger who voted twice for George W. Bush.
That's right, ibeajackass, the lie BO told about BOscare is worse than the lie LBJ told about Vietnam. It's personal, and will end hurting more. "end of discussion"...prick.
If BO were strong, if he wasn't about weakening his own country economically, putting down his country to the world, and dismantling our military, then Putin would have more respect for him and take his threats more seriously. BO is a clown, the only thing missing is a red nose and big floppy shoes. BO should have followed Reagan's model. Putin is a bully, and it's important to make sure he knows you can kick his. It doesn't mean you have to go to war. Putin is KGB, and a communist. BO sends Kerry there and Kerry bitches about that Putin shouldn't be using a 19th century military approach in the 21st century. What is that"
Sorry your teabagger talking points just don't cut it anymore.
Obama's a loser, always was and always will be"
Yet he's where you will never be other than a visitor and he's what you will never be: The President of the United States elected by the people not once but twice. The extent to which you will ever write a book is the dribble you post here day in and day out. As for his rich friends cuddling him along you must have him confused with his predecessor George W. Bush. You and your kind are such sore losers. Maybe you can find the poster MyMy and start a count of the number of days you will have to endure UNTIL PRESIDENT OBAMA'S TERM IS UP AND HILLARY'S TERM BEGINS. Must really suck to be such a sore loser and have to face yourself in the mirror everyday all the while realizing there's nothing you can do except bang your head on the wall and drink your hater-aid. LOL
Seems Obama's the loser pal. Just look around you. Obama's an amateur. Romney and Palin obviously knew Russia was a problem back in'08. Obama had no clue. Keep flyin' blind with the amateur in chief."
President Obama didn't lose to either one of those sad sacks. LOl
ibshame, i didn't say BO was responsible for our debt to China. It's a debt nevertheless. What has BO done to help?
I realize you're a teabagger and it has probably escaped your notice (as most anything that you can't blame President Obama for) but you should read some of the more current economic reports concerning the decrease in the deficit and the increase in GDP.
The point being we've weakened ourselves. We're so pathetic now that we pay Russia $70 million dollars a pop to ferry our astronauts to the space station. Putin does not respect BO and couldn't care less what he says or threatens.
Who cares if Putin thinks President Obama is weak? Are you really that dense to believe Putin would launch a Pre-emptive strike against the U.S. and President Obama would just sit back and allow it to happen?
Who said anything about a war with Russia. Only you.
If you aren't talking war then what exactly are you talking? You're the one who has labled President Obama as weak and not willing to stand up to Putin. What exactly is your idea of standing up to Putin? Oh wait, I don't know why I'm bothering to ask you that. I forgot you're the same one who said Obamacare was worse than the Viet Nam War. End of discussion.
**Thomas Friedman sums it up in the TFP this morning:
"There is much nonsense being written about how Vladimir Putin showed how he is “tougher” than Barack Obama and how Obama now needs to demonstrate his manhood.This is how great powers get drawn into the politics of small tribes and end up in great wars that end badly for everyone. We vastly exaggerate Putin’s strength — so does he — and we vastly underestimate our own strength, and ability to weaken him through nonmilitary means.
Let’s start with Putin. Any man who actually believes, as Putin has said, that the breakup of the Soviet Union was “the greatest geopolitical catastrophe” of the 20th century is caught up in a dangerous fantasy that can’t end well for him or his people. The Soviet Union died because Communism could not provide rising standards of living, and its collapse actually unleashed boundless human energy all across Eastern Europe and Russia. A wise Putin would have redesigned Russia so its vast human talent could take advantage of all that energy. He would be fighting today to get Russia into the European Union, not to keep Ukraine out. But that is not who Putin is and never will be. He is guilty of the soft bigotry of low expectations toward his people and prefers to turn Russia into a mafia-run petro-state — all the better to steal from.
So Putin is now fighting human nature among his own young people and his neighbors — who both want more E.U. and less Putinism. To put it in market terms, Putin is long oil and short history. He has made himself steadily richer and Russia steadily more reliant on natural resources rather than its human ones. History will not be kind to him — especially if energy prices ever collapse.
So spare me the Putin-body-slammed-Obama prattle. This isn’t All-Star Wrestling. The fact that Putin has seized Crimea, a Russian-speaking zone of Ukraine, once part of Russia, where many of the citizens prefer to be part of Russia and where Russia has a major naval base, is not like taking Poland. I support economic and diplomatic sanctions to punish Russia for its violation of international norms and making clear that harsher sanctions, even military aid for Kiev, would ensue should Putin try to bite off more of Ukraine. But we need to remember that that little corner of the world is always going to mean more, much more, to Putin than to us, andwe should refrain from making threats on which we’re not going to deliver."