Just a few weeks ago the right wing nuts and Romney were all blaming President Obama for the high gasoline prices. The price of gasoline has been falling, Does President Obama now get the credit for that?
"cactus said...
When are we going to have a discussion about the really important issues facing our country, like the $16 trillion national debt."
The Repubs in the House have already passed the Ryan Budget so as far as they are concerned that discussion is over. They have proposed more tax cuts for the wealthy paid for by the Middle Class. Deep Spending Cuts for Medicare, Social Security and other so-called entitlement programs. Another debt-ceiling debacle is next on their agenda.
The Dems couldn't be any worse. In fact, it's still a mystery as to why Chuckie even has any competition from his own party. What's the matter is he not right wing enough? He certainly is no moderate, so what's the point for his opponents? Mayfield has already said he can't think of any vote Chuckie has taken that he disagrees with, so why is he running? Weston Wamp has as much chance of getting elected as the local dog-catcher. Who is Ron Bhalla? This is certainly turning out to be one great big farce for the Third District.
The only good thing about tonight's debate is the fact Chuckie will have to show up and defend his record or lack of record. LOL Mayfield will probably end up winning the election just like Chuckie did the last time without ever having to show up for a debate.
So your evidence is that a blogger at a left wing rag says he read it in the NYT but by your own standards that is no evidence at all. I’ll even go as far as calling B.S. on the NYT and you until I see something else that collaborates their and your claims about this so called book. A one sentence reference in an article just isn’t going to get the job done. If the story is true there is other evidence out there but you won't because it is not true.
LMAO at you"
You really are dumber than a THIRD GRADER because you evidently flunked reading comprehension. You asked for proof that Bush was writing a book. Proof of the fact was provided to you not only from the blog but also all you had to do to check to see if the blogger was correct was google the info or check with the New York Times as I did for the article that was MISQUOTED by toes saying the New York Times had labeled President Obama a Socialist. The New York Times article NEVER labled President Obama a Socialist nor did it question whether or not he was a Socialist. William Kristol is the one who provided that question in his blog. NOT THE NEW YORK TIMES.
You aren't just stupid but you are arrogantly stupid. The proof is out there all over the internet as to Bush writing his book on Economic Growth. No matter what source you want to use. Once again go to the mirror and see who has the "poo" on his/her face. LMAO at you
"mymy said...
You should have been watching The Five on Fox. They just finished a discussion re France, etc......"
Sorry but Fox is only good for the syndicated comedies they run each night. After all Fox is owned by Rupert Murdoch, the man an investigative committee of the British Parliament said wasn't fit to run News Corp. Why would anyone trust one of his companies to provide REAL NEWS?
"mymy said...
nooga: NO, Obama has not done the best that could have been done. Just the opposite of what needed to be done. When he said "we are 5 days away from fundamentally changing this country." I knew what he meant. Socialism! You are a foolish person"
Yeah I'll bet the voices in your head tell you quite a bit. Too bad most of it is not reality.
”According to news reports, former President George W. Bush -- whose administration ended as the global financial system collapsed collapsed -- is preparing to publish a book “outlining strategies for economic growth.”
I think I’ll go out on a limb here and say that someone punked you and you’re too low grade to realize you’ve been played. Of course you could always post your proof but we know you will not and can not."
Looks like you've been played AGAIN. Here is your PROOF:
"Coming This Summer: For $24.95, George W. Bush Will Share His ‘Strategies For Economic Growth’
By Pat Garofalo on May 16, 2012 at 10:45 am
Former President George W. Bush jumped back into presidential politics this week, endorsing presumptive 2012 GOP nominee Mitt Romney. He also, according to the New York Times, plans to release a book in two months that will lay out his advice on boosting economic growth:
Gingerly, the 43rd president is beginning to add his voice back into the national dialogue. A month ago, he spoke publicly in favor of one of his defining domestic legacies, the tax cuts that still divide the country. Two months from now, he plans to publish a book outlining strategies for economic growth. And on Tuesday, he made a rare return to Washington to promote freedom overseas."
Over the next 2 ½ hours and about 10,000 characters you rant on and on about this misunderstanding on your part. There’s hardly anything that you could possibly do to affirm your low grade mental state and debating style"
No, what toes attempted to do is to say the New York Times article claimed President Obama was a Socialist. I called him on it just as I call you on your attempts to post crap from right wing rags to support your fantasies. Your problem here is the fact I posted BOTH ARTICLES for the readers to see for themselves that it was NOT THE NEW YORK TIMES CALLING OBAMA A SOCIALIST RATHER IT WAS NONE OTHER THAN WILLIAM KRISTOL who was making that ascertion based on his interpretation of the article. Get a life, you are out of your league with me and I don't usually say that to anyone but it must be said to you.
"TOES02800 said... The very last sentence says exactly this, "....is Obama (more or less) a socialist? Now when you have the most truthful newspaper in the world asking that question, you have to wonder"
THE MOST TRUTHFUL NEWSPAPER IN THE WORLD DID NOT ASK THAT QUESTION AND IF YOU CAN SHOW WHERE THE ARTICLE FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES ASKS THAT QUESTION YOU WIN THE ARGUMENT BUT YOU CAN'T BECAUSE IT'S NOT THERE. That is why I posted both articles to prove my point. YOU ON THE OTHER HAND SHOW EXACTLY WHY YOU ARE AS DUMB AS SARAH PALIN.
Cheap Shots
Just a few weeks ago the right wing nuts and Romney were all blaming President Obama for the high gasoline prices. The price of gasoline has been falling, Does President Obama now get the credit for that?
Bennett Archive: Pay Equity
"cactus said... When are we going to have a discussion about the really important issues facing our country, like the $16 trillion national debt."
The Repubs in the House have already passed the Ryan Budget so as far as they are concerned that discussion is over. They have proposed more tax cuts for the wealthy paid for by the Middle Class. Deep Spending Cuts for Medicare, Social Security and other so-called entitlement programs. Another debt-ceiling debacle is next on their agenda.
The Candidate
The Dems couldn't be any worse. In fact, it's still a mystery as to why Chuckie even has any competition from his own party. What's the matter is he not right wing enough? He certainly is no moderate, so what's the point for his opponents? Mayfield has already said he can't think of any vote Chuckie has taken that he disagrees with, so why is he running? Weston Wamp has as much chance of getting elected as the local dog-catcher. Who is Ron Bhalla? This is certainly turning out to be one great big farce for the Third District.
The Candidate
The only good thing about tonight's debate is the fact Chuckie will have to show up and defend his record or lack of record. LOL Mayfield will probably end up winning the election just like Chuckie did the last time without ever having to show up for a debate.
Deregulation
"tu_quoque said...
So your evidence is that a blogger at a left wing rag says he read it in the NYT but by your own standards that is no evidence at all. I’ll even go as far as calling B.S. on the NYT and you until I see something else that collaborates their and your claims about this so called book. A one sentence reference in an article just isn’t going to get the job done. If the story is true there is other evidence out there but you won't because it is not true.
LMAO at you"
You really are dumber than a THIRD GRADER because you evidently flunked reading comprehension. You asked for proof that Bush was writing a book. Proof of the fact was provided to you not only from the blog but also all you had to do to check to see if the blogger was correct was google the info or check with the New York Times as I did for the article that was MISQUOTED by toes saying the New York Times had labeled President Obama a Socialist. The New York Times article NEVER labled President Obama a Socialist nor did it question whether or not he was a Socialist. William Kristol is the one who provided that question in his blog. NOT THE NEW YORK TIMES.
You aren't just stupid but you are arrogantly stupid. The proof is out there all over the internet as to Bush writing his book on Economic Growth. No matter what source you want to use. Once again go to the mirror and see who has the "poo" on his/her face. LMAO at you
Deregulation
"mymy said... You should have been watching The Five on Fox. They just finished a discussion re France, etc......"
Sorry but Fox is only good for the syndicated comedies they run each night. After all Fox is owned by Rupert Murdoch, the man an investigative committee of the British Parliament said wasn't fit to run News Corp. Why would anyone trust one of his companies to provide REAL NEWS?
Deregulation
"mymy said... nooga: NO, Obama has not done the best that could have been done. Just the opposite of what needed to be done. When he said "we are 5 days away from fundamentally changing this country." I knew what he meant. Socialism! You are a foolish person"
Yeah I'll bet the voices in your head tell you quite a bit. Too bad most of it is not reality.
Deregulation
More like shooting fish in a barrel or shooting a herd of moose from a helicopter. LOL
Deregulation
"tu_quoque said... Noogies Haranges:
”According to news reports, former President George W. Bush -- whose administration ended as the global financial system collapsed collapsed -- is preparing to publish a book “outlining strategies for economic growth.”
I think I’ll go out on a limb here and say that someone punked you and you’re too low grade to realize you’ve been played. Of course you could always post your proof but we know you will not and can not."
Looks like you've been played AGAIN. Here is your PROOF:
"Coming This Summer: For $24.95, George W. Bush Will Share His ‘Strategies For Economic Growth’ By Pat Garofalo on May 16, 2012 at 10:45 am
Former President George W. Bush jumped back into presidential politics this week, endorsing presumptive 2012 GOP nominee Mitt Romney. He also, according to the New York Times, plans to release a book in two months that will lay out his advice on boosting economic growth:
Gingerly, the 43rd president is beginning to add his voice back into the national dialogue. A month ago, he spoke publicly in favor of one of his defining domestic legacies, the tax cuts that still divide the country. Two months from now, he plans to publish a book outlining strategies for economic growth. And on Tuesday, he made a rare return to Washington to promote freedom overseas."
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/05/16/484981/bush-economic-book/?mobile=nc
DON'T YOU GET TIRED OF LOOKING STUPID???
Deregulation
"tu_quoque said...
Over the next 2 ½ hours and about 10,000 characters you rant on and on about this misunderstanding on your part. There’s hardly anything that you could possibly do to affirm your low grade mental state and debating style"
No, what toes attempted to do is to say the New York Times article claimed President Obama was a Socialist. I called him on it just as I call you on your attempts to post crap from right wing rags to support your fantasies. Your problem here is the fact I posted BOTH ARTICLES for the readers to see for themselves that it was NOT THE NEW YORK TIMES CALLING OBAMA A SOCIALIST RATHER IT WAS NONE OTHER THAN WILLIAM KRISTOL who was making that ascertion based on his interpretation of the article. Get a life, you are out of your league with me and I don't usually say that to anyone but it must be said to you.
"TOES02800 said... The very last sentence says exactly this, "....is Obama (more or less) a socialist? Now when you have the most truthful newspaper in the world asking that question, you have to wonder"
THE MOST TRUTHFUL NEWSPAPER IN THE WORLD DID NOT ASK THAT QUESTION AND IF YOU CAN SHOW WHERE THE ARTICLE FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES ASKS THAT QUESTION YOU WIN THE ARGUMENT BUT YOU CAN'T BECAUSE IT'S NOT THERE. That is why I posted both articles to prove my point. YOU ON THE OTHER HAND SHOW EXACTLY WHY YOU ARE AS DUMB AS SARAH PALIN.