Update: Carr's bill has failed. He might as well drop out now. Alexander will crush him. Loyalty oath to a party, that's almost as bad as the Road Kill Bill.LOL
You forgot this gem of a piece of legislation from the TFP yesterday:
The Tennessee General Assembly is considering a bill that would require voters in partisan primaries to declare that the party they are voting for "most closely represents [their] values and beliefs."
What this is meant to do is discourage those in opposing parties to cross over when their intent is to maliciously malign the election of either primary party," said the bill's sponsor, Rep. Joe Carr, R-Lascassas, as the House Local Government Subcommittee discussed the legislation.
Carr is challenging Lamar Alexander for his U.S. Senate seat in this year's Republican primary.
This is funny, Carr is worried Dems will cross over and vote for Alexander in the primary. So, he decides to come up with another obstacle for voters but this time it's aimed at protecting the "integrity" of the primaries.
Someone should ask him, what about independents? Does this mean they don't get to vote? The realization Alexander is way ahead of him when it comes to fund-raising must be a heavy burden. So he thinks the only way he's got an even shot at the playing field is if he can keep the Dems from crossing over to vote for Alexander.
Alexander on the other hand kept a real low profile on the VW/UAW controversy and let Corker be the front man because Corker had nothing to lose. Alexander didn't want to tick off the Dems in Middle and in particular West Tennessee because to do so might mean they would in fact cross over and vote for Carr in the primary just to keep Alexander out. Haslam tried to help Alexander by dangling the prospect of selling a megasite in Memphis to a Car Manufacturer even it was already affiliated with the UAW. Evidently the Suppliers could go to Memphis but not come to Chatt. If the Dems had someone strong enough to run against Alexander they could crush him but they don't so he's safe.
Carr wants to remove Alexander's safety net. This bill is a desperate attempt on his part to make it happen no matter it requires one to take a loyalty oath to a party in order to vote. I know loyalty oaths to upholding the Constitution of the United States are legal but a loyalty oath to a POLITICAL PARTY IN ORDER TO VOTE? Something definitely "rotten in Denmark."
It's too bad the Dems don't have strong candidates like they once had, people like McWherter, Naifeh, Bredsen(All came from either Middle or West Tennessee). Maybe one day this part of the state will be fortunate to have a Strong Dem seek the Governor's Mansion or some higher office. Would be very nice to see a Governor Berke or a U.S. Senator Berke or even higher.
I understand that but he calls me unbalanced when the unbalanced one is the one caught in a lie and still tries to maintain everyone else is a fool and has had their face rubbed in something.
So sorry to burst your bubble but foaming at the mouth? Hardly, laughing my a*s off is more like it. Tuquoque is what he/she/it has always been "A legend in his/her/its own mind" and now exposed as just another nutjob liar.
Now let's see whose face has been rubbed in it. Like taking candy from a baby.
It's really sad when a poster is caught flat out lying and someone like Jesse tries to come to their rescue by claiming the person that caught the poster in a lie is unbalanced. You are as unbalanced as Tuquoque(also known as Jt...) if you think he/she/it shouldn't be called out on his/her/ its lies. My original post last week was about no one being able to find any posts by him/her/ it because they had all been pulled once he/she/it was banned and I was right. No where on this forum will you find ANY ORIGINAL POSTS BY TU_QUOQUE BECAUSE HE/SHE/IT WAS BANNED AND NOT ALLOWED TO POST ANYMORE USING THAT NAME. It all happened the night he/she/it had a breakdown and used very vile language towards Mr. Bennett on the Sandy Hook Thread in Dec. 2012. He/she/it came back as the name they are using now but as TuQuoque he/she/it was banned and the only posts one will find is as I stated: a post he/she/it made and it was copied by another poster to make a comment.
Prove me wrong and find an ORIGINAL POST MADE BY TUQUOQUE AFTER THE DEC. 2012 Sandy Hook cartoon. When I say original make sure it's not a post copied by another poster to make a comment. You're so balanced now find one if you dare.
If course we all know you won't do it and neither will he/she/it because you won't find one. I know and now so does everyone else.
Unbalanced because I proved Tuquoque to be a liar? How unbalanced does that make you?
"The Gun Debate | Times Free Press
Chattanooga Times Free Press
Feb 12, 2013 - "tu_quoque said... Ibshame said ... Too bad Antonin Scalia doesn't agree with your interpretation of what limitations can be placed on the ...
Very odd that you remember so vividly that this tu_quoque person was banned in Dec. 2012 but here he is still posting in the middle of Feb. 2013. The irony that he was rubbing your face in some B.S. you posted is delightful.... don’t you think so?
BTW ... thanks for reminding me to check the date I first posted at this rag ... In 9 more days it will be my one year anniversary (March 19th) ... Not the April date you gave ... kind of puts a downer on just about everything you posted.... But it is odd that I showed up here about 1 month after this ball-buster tu_quoque left or was it banned? .... Right?
You're a liar and now I'm going to prove it. You have lied for the last time. If you look at the thread you have posted you will see there is not a SINGLE POST FROM YOU BECAUSE IT WAS PULLED WHEN YOU GOT BANNED. YES, YOU MADE THE ATTEMPT AND I COPIED A STATEMENT YOU HAD MADE BUT NO WHERE ON THAT THREAD WILL YOU FIND THE ACTUAL POST THAT YOU MADE. INSTEAD YOU FIND WHAT IS DONE ALL THE TIME ON THIS FORUM. A POSTER COPIES ANOTHER POSTER'S COMMENT TO MAKE A COMMENT. I DID THAT WITH YOUR POST BUT NO WHERE WILL ANYONE FIND THE ORIGINAL POST YOU MADE BECAUSE IT WAS PULLED WHEN THE TFP REALIZED YOU WERE TRYING TO SNEAK BACK IN AFTER YOU HAD BEEN BANNED AS TU_QUOQUE. FIND YOUR ORIGINAL POST. LMFAO AT YOU.
In fact find any original post you made as Tuquoque after the Dec. thread when you had your meltdown. The only thing you're going to find are the attempts you made to post but they got pulled once the TFP realized you were trying to sneak back in after they told you to hit the road.
You libs, you're tactics are transparent. That phony act by Elijah Cummings was predictable. You want to divert attention from the corruption, the obvious corruption of the IRS, to Issa. Making him the object of attention by making him out to be a racist, and a criminal. Focus,' morons."
No, you need to focus but evidently that is something teabaggers are incapable of doing unless it is some made up bullsh*t you think is going to bring President Obama down. It's why the Republicans want you out but they don't have the guts to push you out. THERE IS NOTHING TO THE IRS SCANDAL. THEY HAVE ALREADY CLOSED THE BOOKS ON THAT AND THERE IS NOTHING LERNER OR ANYONE ELSE HAS TO SAY ABOUT IT. IF ISSA COULD MAKE SOMETHING OUT OF IT, HE WOULD BUT HE IS NOT ABLE TO DO SO BECAUSE THERE IS NOTHING THERE!
The Repubs are ruing the day they let your group slither into their party. They thought they could use you to take back the White House. So they let you hold your rallies and shout all your stupid, dumba*s slogans and in the end YOU COULDN'T DELIVER BECAUSE THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS SEE YOU FOR WHAT YOU ARE. YOU WOULD RATHER DESTROY THIS COUNTRY THEN BUILD IT UP. YOU ARE LIKE AN OOZING SORE BUT THE REPUBS LET YOU IN SO THEY WILL HAVE TO GET RID OF YOU. Meantime the Dems will continue to elect the President of the United States and will eventually take back the House and the Senate if not in 2014 then for sure by 2016. Your time has come and gone. 2010 was your year but FORTUNATELY THAT WAS IT.
New Age psychic Jean Houston prompted then-first lady Hillary to have an imaginary chat with Eleanor Roosevelt.
“Washington Post” Watergate reporter Bob Woodward reported the incident in his 1996 book, “The Choice,” and once revived, “the revelation will make Hillary look like a fool,” said the source.
by BARRY LEVINE LEON WAGENER, STEVE HERZ & JOHN BLOSSER
Did Barry, Leon, Steve and John also include the consultations Nancy Reagan had with her astrologer? BTW you still have not included where you got this article by the above. See you still have not referenced it correctly. Now let us know where to look for publication you found all the information by this group.
See like this:
Notice the word RESEARCH in the source and when you go to the link you find the various newspapers and articles from which you can get the info on Issa. Of course, it's obvious you don't understand referencing so that makes you a plagerizer does it not?? You are too easy. LOL
ibeshamed. so you are scared of my question, huh?"
I can't think of anything you have EVER posted that had me scared but if you want to know Hillary's Accomplishments (since you sit in front of a computer most days anyway) Google Hillary Clinton's Accomplishments and you will find them all. I do my own research and have no desire to do anyone else's unless they are telling bold face lies and it needs to be pointed out.