inquiringmind's comment history

inquiringmind said...

right on the point, ibshame

October 19, 2014 at 5:44 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

To put it more directly, you created a problem to solve your problem that few African Americans, Hispanics or low income people vote RED.

October 19, 2014 at 12:52 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

fairmon, Because it worked that way for years with no problem

October 19, 2014 at 12:51 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

Anyone who can present a voter registration card or their name, legal address and attest that the card or address is true and they are a legal resident should be able to vote with no restriction.

October 19, 2014 at 9:35 a.m.
inquiringmind said...

At least you lack of patriotism is consistent jack

October 18, 2014 at 11:57 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

Choosing a trusted associate to stay on top of the crisis is crazy? Like I said you have nothing useful to say on this issue

October 18, 2014 at 10:45 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

ols tjd asks if the President's pick is "prudent?"

President Obama is a very intelligent person. It appears from "unofficial sources" he is livid at the lax response by CDC and others in Texas and has acted to put someone in charge who has management skills to assess and provide good advice and direction so the President can deal with all the other crises you REDS complain about.

If President Obama feels this is the right guy I'm ok with it. If we all are in this together to support the government taking adequate precautions rather than making inane political points you ought to be supporting him as well.

October 18, 2014 at 6:40 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

The history of the modern Republican Party justifies their assumed label as RED. They are on record as supporting any voter control measure that makes it easier to register to vote, or to vote at all. There should be no question of their anti-American sentiment. They have put up a smoke screen screaming voter fraud, but have represented not one instance where voter fraud resulted in a conviction or worse, a reversal of an otherwise fair election.

October 18, 2014 at 2:24 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

I suspected it would not take long before a RED piped up and validated my observation:

old tjd sez, "The Redeemer appts a 100% political operative as Czar and you yell political." Collaboration is not taking potshots at the President or worse, second guessing him because you disagree with the criteria he used to select his deputy.

October 18, 2014 at 2:17 p.m.
inquiringmind said...

The one time folks on the right (AKA "the REDS") could actually simply demonstrate that they have the good of the nation at heart by simply joining forces with the government (also called collaboration in the national interest) that is trying to apply rational control over the ebola problem, but what do they do, immediately try to make it political and fan the fires of hysteria hoping it will generate votes.

It not only reveals their naked pragmatism, but also their stone-cold patriotism. I read some crazy story that they think Obama intentionally brought ebola to the US so he could declare martial law. How ignorant.

October 18, 2014 at 12:53 p.m.
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.