You don't know the first thing about science, con. Piltdown does not refute evolution.
Scientists are struggling to explain why global warming slowed down for 15 years, and greenhouse gas emissions keep rising. Global cooling?
No, but they think they may have figured it out. The next couple of years will be telling. It has to do with the Pacific currents and increased heat absorption there. If their hypothesis is correct, when the Pacific currents revert back to their normal patterns (which they see signs of now), warming will accelerate for a awhile to catch up. If it doesn't, then their hypothesis is incorrect.
It was "discovered" by other scientists.
You think we haven't heard of "Piltdown"? That old canard was abandoned by Creationists decades ago. You need to catch up.
Con, that is the exact same post you put up a couple of days ago. Don't you have anything new?
Next you'll quote Duane Gish. Or Ray "Banana Man" Comfort.
You dismantled the heathen religion of evolution in such a short space.
He should go collect his Nobel Prize. Shifting a scientific paradigm is HUGE. Who'd thought we had such talent in Chattanooga?
Love the new avatar, PT.
Public consensus and scientific consensus are not the same thing. The public believes a lot of silly stuff.
Your research is NOT in an area related to evolution, and your point is moot. Would you ask that people outside of your field accept your work at your word? Would you accept those IN your field to accept your work at your word?
Do you have a point in opposition to evolution?
If not, what is the point of your snarky comments except to be a $hit?
If so, why do you think you know more than the scientists that actually do the work?
And if you have a problem with my correcting people's misconceptions about evolution, too bad. You don't seem to have a problem "correcting" other people on this forum.
then just maybe what you are trying to do is turn us into a theocracy
Oh, but you don't understand. That's EXACTLY what connie wants.