Never said otherwise. But Noah represents a genetic bottleneck. So all humanity must trace its genetics to him and his wife. Basic science. Please answer my question.
Oh, I agree. In scientific discussions I never use the word proof. But semantics are lost on ol' Ken here. He has no clue what science is or how it is done.
No, the entire human race was wiped out according to Genesis. Get your own myths straight. All humans should be related to Noah and his wife.
So answer the question.
Curious Ken's obsession with HIV: the highest infection rates are in the South, where gays are most likely to be closeted. Why is that, Ken?
Answer the question, Ken.
I guess Noah also has been falsified: genomes and mitochondrial DNA do not show humanity's ancestry leading back 4000 years to a single man and woman in the Middle East.
The evidence for a worldwide flood simply doesn't exist. If there was a flood you would find certain geological features; these do not exist. If there was an ark built as in Genesis it could be built again. Wooden ships smaller than the ark come apart in calm water. That is about as close to "proof" in layman's terms as one can get. The flood and the ark are about the most testable 'claims' from genesis.
Yes, you are right that negatives can't be proven. But claims can be falsified. And these have been as has the notion of a 6000 year earth.
Yes. There is definitive proof that there was no global flood and no ark as described in Genesis. So answer my question: did God lie when he wrote that?
Did God lie when he wrote Genesis, Ken? There was no flood or ark.
As been the case for thousands of years? Hogwash. Marriage between one man and one woman is a modern state contract.