Coleman did not ask to be penciled in as #1. He simply qualified the coach in asking if he would have a chance to win the job. With the coach's proclaimed policy that positions would be won on the field, it was only appropriate for the qb to find out where he stood, especially when considering the statistical comparison. There's nothing wrong with asking for a job review, is there?
Turning to the statistics, 44% completion percentage and a TD/INT ratio below one looks like 4-7 again. A completion percentage in the 60's in today's short passing game is a must. Coleman positioned himself well through performance. For Volniacs, it would be nice to have a qb in the 60's again.
Coleman's reported assessment was plausible, and Kiffin failed to keep his best asset for the qb position in the fold.
You say "asset"? Yes, asset. College football is a business.
BLOG: Colemangate could haunt Vols all season
Coleman did not ask to be penciled in as #1. He simply qualified the coach in asking if he would have a chance to win the job. With the coach's proclaimed policy that positions would be won on the field, it was only appropriate for the qb to find out where he stood, especially when considering the statistical comparison. There's nothing wrong with asking for a job review, is there?
Turning to the statistics, 44% completion percentage and a TD/INT ratio below one looks like 4-7 again. A completion percentage in the 60's in today's short passing game is a must. Coleman positioned himself well through performance. For Volniacs, it would be nice to have a qb in the 60's again.
Coleman's reported assessment was plausible, and Kiffin failed to keep his best asset for the qb position in the fold.
You say "asset"? Yes, asset. College football is a business.