OOps, I am new to this. I think I posted this somewhere else. Anyways, my response to this was that Philip Seaton would not be that someone with a hard on for these stories. Any doctor should know that a penis should not be removed without specific consent from that patient. I think that a lot of men would agree to the fact that they would rather die than to have their penis amputated and Mr. Seaton was not given that option. This poor man, what a terrible thing I hope he wins millions from this law suit although I bet he'd rather have his organ back than any amount of money. So sad.
Well we all know anyone who has a hard on for these stories would not include Philip Seaton....Poor guy, any doctor with any compassion would know that a mans penis should not be removed without specific consent and many, probably most men would rather die than lose their penis!!!
Trial set over Kentucky doctor’s amputation of penis
OOps, I am new to this. I think I posted this somewhere else. Anyways, my response to this was that Philip Seaton would not be that someone with a hard on for these stories. Any doctor should know that a penis should not be removed without specific consent from that patient. I think that a lot of men would agree to the fact that they would rather die than to have their penis amputated and Mr. Seaton was not given that option. This poor man, what a terrible thing I hope he wins millions from this law suit although I bet he'd rather have his organ back than any amount of money. So sad.
msbleedingluv
Well we all know anyone who has a hard on for these stories would not include Philip Seaton....Poor guy, any doctor with any compassion would know that a mans penis should not be removed without specific consent and many, probably most men would rather die than lose their penis!!!