Maybe if we had philosophers instead
of technicians at the front of the
classroom we would be turning out more
students with the ability to think for
themselves. I am not sure that is the
goal of the public education system
though.
That would be a philosophy class, not a science class. As lkeithlu stated, ID could easily be used in a science class to explain how science works, which would explain why ID is NOT science.
”tu quoque, Mntgrl anwered your
question with elegance.”
“Elegance” … Really?? … Sure you don’t
want to raise your standards just a
bit??
This is what I got from her response
and it hardly appears to be an answer
as those usually don’t end with a
question mark. She sure seems to be
baffled as to what the law’s true
purpose happens to be.
“If this law is not allowing
discussion of creationism or
intelligent design or whatever you
wanna call it as you imply, then what
purpose does this bill even serve?”
Which is a question you seem to be unable to answer.
Taking that into account why don’t one
of you so called Libtard "Bright"
Boys/Girls tell us how those subjects
will be taught in public schools due
to this law. No your real fear is not
that those subjects will be addressed
but that some of your precious dogma
may be questioned in front of young
skulls full of mush.
Real science has no dogma by definition. If this law is not allowing discussion of creationism or intelligent design or whatever you wanna call it as you imply, then what purpose does this bill even serve? Real science always questions itself. Creationism does not. If not the religious questions, then what else is currently being denied these science teachers?
I did not read that as his definition at all Nurse... and if you were a real nurse you should know the difference between an actual physical tether and a figurative one.
Every time shifarobe/joneses posts I cannot help but picture Mayella Ewell. Powhitetrash blaming a black man for all of thier troubles, when they know deep down it was their own daddy's fault all along
Busted!
That would be a philosophy class, not a science class. As lkeithlu stated, ID could easily be used in a science class to explain how science works, which would explain why ID is NOT science.
Good Advice
looks like Joneses found a new name
Good Advice
Google instantly shows those men were arrested and charged, unlike Zimmerman. Says nothing about President Obama or Bennett.
The Textbook
tu_quoque said...
Which is a question you seem to be unable to answer.
The Textbook
Real science has no dogma by definition. If this law is not allowing discussion of creationism or intelligent design or whatever you wanna call it as you imply, then what purpose does this bill even serve? Real science always questions itself. Creationism does not. If not the religious questions, then what else is currently being denied these science teachers?
Doctor's Orders
I did not read that as his definition at all Nurse... and if you were a real nurse you should know the difference between an actual physical tether and a figurative one.
Doctor's Orders
So are Romney, Santorum, Gingrich and Ron Paul... Its a conspiracy!!!!
The Hitchhiker
Every time shifarobe/joneses posts I cannot help but picture Mayella Ewell. Powhitetrash blaming a black man for all of thier troubles, when they know deep down it was their own daddy's fault all along
The Hitchhiker
mymy, you don't seem to realize free speech includes the right to call others out on what they say. How exactly are you not allowed to speak?
Reasonable Suspicion
"...more nanny state..." - Thanks to the republican party