JR, please go back and read my post, and the link, then explain in detail how that is in any way anti-Christian or bigoted.
Please note that site is a Christian site written by Christians for Christians. Are they anti-Christian bigots?
Intelligent Christians do exist
Just rare to see on this forum.
Here is a good article written by an Intelligent Christian - good reading for many here...
NRMA is perfect!
and helps explain why they want a registry... for marketing!
I said brainwashing because they intentionally lied about this bill leading to a registry, and supporters bought it.
Now I am starting to think the NRA actually wants a registry...
Background checks already exist for dealers, this simply expanded that to gun shows and internet sales - and made keeping a list a jailable offense.
Is there currently any penalty for gun dealers who run background checks keeping a list?
"The threat of a registry looms when background checks are expanded further. You know what the potential is after that."
This is a really good example of how the NRA is brainwashing you folks. How many of you even realize this bill would have made a registry actually illegal? Why would the NRA not be fully behind a bill that actually controls only people, not guns AND actually negates the threat of a national registry?
So a "mob" of teenagers is afraid of guns, but a "gang" of them is not?
"If the teens knew they might encounter a CC holder they would not be mobbing pedestrians"
"That would be because the vast majority of those "kids" were members of gangs gunning each other down."
Do you see the logical fallacy here?
Why would pedestrians with guns deter them if other armed gang members do not?
"Easy, a 1 or 2 year old can't survive by him or herself any more than a fetus could. Enlighten yourself. If the child is unwanted and the mother makes the decision for financial or other reasons, why not just put the child out of misery? That's the 1 or 2 year old child."
A 1 or 2 yr old can however be raised by another mother. A fetus cannot. See the difference?
Thanks BRP, I questioned your use of idea of this being immoral and your answer is "Those who can afford it and think it worth it should be free to take advantage of it. Those who cannot afford the fancy, new fangled treatments should not be led to believe that they are automatically entitled to them at someone else’s expense."
So life saving treatments are only morally entitled to the wealthy... A child with cancer should just die in order no pennies are taken from your pocket...
That is a great description of modern day Conservative morals.