tu_quoque, yesterday was the first time I've read your work. (Ironic, since just the day before I called out another poster using the Tu Quoque Fallacy (having to do w/ comparing Susan Rice to Condi)).
As you see, I also struggle with the need for brevity.
Not a complaint here, but just wondering -- why post an entire article with 3 long comments when a link to it would suffice?
Joke's on you, Bennett -- your ticket was a winner!
You correctly picked the Powerball number: 6.
That would have paid $4, but you tore up your ticket.
Oh well, back to work....
Joke's on you, Bennett -- your ticket was a winner!
It correctlly picked the Powerball number: 6.
That would have paid $4, but you tore up your ticket.
Oh well, back to work....
Oh Well
tu_quoque, yesterday was the first time I've read your work. (Ironic, since just the day before I called out another poster using the Tu Quoque Fallacy (having to do w/ comparing Susan Rice to Condi)).
As you see, I also struggle with the need for brevity.
Not a complaint here, but just wondering -- why post an entire article with 3 long comments when a link to it would suffice?
Oh Well
Joke's on you, Bennett -- your ticket was a winner! You correctly picked the Powerball number: 6. That would have paid $4, but you tore up your ticket. Oh well, back to work....
oddsox
Joke's on you, Bennett -- your ticket was a winner! It correctlly picked the Powerball number: 6. That would have paid $4, but you tore up your ticket. Oh well, back to work....