I tend to agree with you that this isn't the proper use of the verse. But, the fact that one person being offended by it can claim it's a volation of federal law, when clearly it isn't is another issue altogether.
Serena, funny, that's the response most liberals have when confronted with the facts. But, actually reading the Constitution helps. You should try it. Also, lay off the NPR if you really want to know what's actually going on.
Your logic that things can be "read into" the Constitution is exactly the kind of thinking that has screwed this country up. Anything not spelled out in the Constitution is left to the states, not made up by activitist judges and liberals who want the document to say whatever they would like it to. So, yes, I can argue against the Constitution saying everything you just pretended it says.
This liberal lie of "separation of church and state" has to end. The Constitution states that the state cannot establish a religion, in the same vein as the Church of England at the time. The fact that liberals have been able to get activitist judges to read something into the Constitution that clearly doesn't exist is nonsense. This cannot be allowed to stand and the country stand. The first step to the takeover by a socialist/Marksist/Communist government is the elimination of religion from the public square.
Cheerleaders’ religious signs draw fire
somethingorother,
I tend to agree with you that this isn't the proper use of the verse. But, the fact that one person being offended by it can claim it's a volation of federal law, when clearly it isn't is another issue altogether.
Cheerleaders’ religious signs draw fire
Serena, funny, that's the response most liberals have when confronted with the facts. But, actually reading the Constitution helps. You should try it. Also, lay off the NPR if you really want to know what's actually going on.
Cheerleaders’ religious signs draw fire
Desertman,
Your logic that things can be "read into" the Constitution is exactly the kind of thinking that has screwed this country up. Anything not spelled out in the Constitution is left to the states, not made up by activitist judges and liberals who want the document to say whatever they would like it to. So, yes, I can argue against the Constitution saying everything you just pretended it says.
Cheerleaders’ religious signs draw fire
This liberal lie of "separation of church and state" has to end. The Constitution states that the state cannot establish a religion, in the same vein as the Church of England at the time. The fact that liberals have been able to get activitist judges to read something into the Constitution that clearly doesn't exist is nonsense. This cannot be allowed to stand and the country stand. The first step to the takeover by a socialist/Marksist/Communist government is the elimination of religion from the public square.