Breaking News
next news
prev news

rolando's comment history

rolando said...

I don't know, carlB. How many jobs have they prevented?

February 7, 2012 at 10:38 p.m.
rolando said...

All things said, done, and considered, I rather astonishingly find myself pleased with Bennett's cartoon. With only 10% of the delegates selected, undermining The Mitt is a good thing.

I am automatically opposed to anyone favoring and/or supporting The RINO-disguised-as-a-conservative Mitt; that includes George Soros, the Lame Stream Media and alphabet networks, and the 81 Republican Washington elite insiders. He is anything but a conservative. To paraphrase Soros, "There is little difference between Obama and Romney."

So I am on Clay's side on this one, for what that's worth...panning The Mitt is a good thing no matter how you look at it.

February 7, 2012 at 10:08 p.m.
rolando said...

Moral: If your organization/business contributes to an immoral or amoral organization, be prepared to pay them forever, whether you want to or not...and regardless of the immoral/amoral organization's misuse of your funds.

Give them nothing of substance. If you do and try to stop, lawsuits and governmental threats will follow. Gay-ron-teeed.


And Komen never said she ended the funding over abortions; it was because PP does not perform mammograms...it financed third-parties to do them...but kept a portion of the Komen funds anyway.

Komen simply decided to finance mammogram providers directly, thereby increasing the number of tests given -- and the number of lives saved. That is, after all, what Komen does...test to save lives.

PP tests to ends them. And the Anti-Life addicts/zealots use the Saul Alinsky method of misdirection and misquoting to quell all objections...

February 6, 2012 at 8:37 p.m.
rolando said...

That was government executives, newbulbs. They don't need to buy anything...they just make the laws to exclude themselves.

They haven't worked for us for at least 46 years.

"WE" can change it? And exactly how will that happen? More ACORN and/or Black Panther thugs? Or by royal Presidential/Dictatorial fiat?

Even if true.

We are living in interesting times, indeed.

February 6, 2012 at 8:23 p.m.
rolando said...

Is anyone surprised that the costs have skyrocketed?

"We won't know what is in it until we pass it." That's Democrat "logic" at its height.

In case anyone wonders, the Death Panels have already begun weighing...unless you are one of the elite who contributed to the "right" party [wink, wink].

By the by, just so no one forgets, only one Republican Congressman voted for ObamaCare. And he was a newbie Representative.

This is a 100% Democrat baby -- pity they didn't abort it, as they so carelessly do for other "things".

February 6, 2012 at 8 p.m.
rolando said...

Consider these Free Press articles/editorials the written version of Clay Bennett's scribblings. Each has its own adherents. Each has what some consider "misinformation" while delivering their own version of distorted "truth". Each has what the "other side" considers tiring old "non-factual drivel".

Consider today's offering by Bennett.....how old and tiring is that one-trick-pony "drivel"?

February 6, 2012 at 7:52 p.m.
rolando said...

Like Wash, DC, newbulbs. Only difference is, the one-percenters are joining the money they have stashed overseas.

In any case, you missed my point...that lost 40% of total tax revenue must come from someplace...can't get it from those who pay no taxes anyway [the 47% who ride free, including the 10% who are given "refunds"]...so that narrows it down to the rest of us.

February 6, 2012 at 7:44 p.m.
rolando said...

In a way -- a rather twisted sort of way -- it is the government's job...after all, they caused it. If it didn't reward the losers later in life for cheating themselves out of a decent education and a way to earn a decent wage, they wouldn't cheat...or if they did, they would have only themselves to blame.

Cheaters have been with us forever. Anyone remember the days of high school "bone-head" English and shop class for the losers? One thing, it allowed the rest of us to learn life-skills to earn our own way.

February 6, 2012 at 6:08 p.m.
rolando said...

Funny. I can't recall the last time I received a snail-mail letter from the government that didn't include some form of bad news...and a threat...along with a sprinkling of the good to sweeten it up a bit. Virtually all such "letters" contain a threat of some kind, usually involving perjury or false statements [including the penalty]...'course that doesn't mean much when our top executives get away with it all the time...but then again, they are effectively above the law, aren't they?

February 6, 2012 at 6:02 p.m.
rolando said...

"Unproductive military spending". I love that phrase. We must be firing $100 bills out of those cannons, machineguns, fighters, bombers, etc. Why, that cash is paper mached into tanks, HumVees, etc. We must be lining flak vests with cash. Then when a shell hits, a bomb drops, etc that money is just left there for the taking.

So just accept the above and forget about who is really getting the cash...very highly skilled American workers, for instance. All who work in those beaneries, etc around the factories. All those arms manufacturers who sell to us peons trying to protect our families from the coming disaster, and so on.

Yes, even the CEOs and other corporate executives who spend the money on mansions [built by illegals who send the money across the border, but why quibble], yachts, airplanes, Bugatti Veyrons, etc.

So who ya gunna call when outlay exceeds income and the devil comes a'knockin'? The loser 99-percenter Occupiers? Now that's funny.

February 6, 2012 at 5:51 p.m.
advertisement
400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, permissions and privacy policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2012, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.