jose jimenez - bill dana - alan shepard (the right stuff)
no substance, just junk, trash, as expected.
According to some of the posts I've read on this site, this poor child would not dare to climb on this lap, because dems poisoned the repub well with social security, medicare, medicaid, food stamps, and other types of socialism. The cartoon is, therefore, inaccurate. Nonetheless, in efforts to object to the cartoon or to show their stupidity or ignorance or disdain without regard to the cartoon or the topic:
junktrash will copy and post drivel - boldly marking parts of it - from someone with no credentials.
In his unique spirit of christmas, joneses will talk about his multi-million dollar company and his decision to cancel health care insurance for employees and pocket the savings.
maxistinkypad, whatever she says, will remind us that she truly has nothing to say of any consequence.
conservative will quote passages of his bible.
no truth, the least offensive (he is, after all, a moderate), will post a cryptic remark.
and so it goes.
Okay, girls (you know who I'm talking to), Clay's new cartoon has been posted. Time for you to start trashing him for that one. Few of you comprehend that one of the purposes of an editorial cartoon is to have folks think about it. Ideally, of course, genuine critical thinking and expression would result. Oh, well. Bring it on.
That's right, junktrash, just make it up as you go along, as "you guys" always do.
"Generalizing" at about double? What a FKNG maroon! Just keep making it worse.
And no, numbnutz, a 70% gain would have it at about 92. You are math challenged, at least.
And BTW, I doubt your lack of basic math skills, not to say logic, is the least of your worries "going to your death." You have a plan for that?
There's at least one reason jt,etc is not called mathboy, as multiplying 54 by 2 is 108, not 80 - duh. And WalMart is a pretty good investment, but it hit 40 about 6 years ago, not 3 as he and maxi claimed.
I sure am glad that I don't have any relatives who drink and who might subject me to ridicule from moderates.
mwarren, you are dead wrong. Not one of the three shooters had any legal basis to shoot anyone. If they had stayed inside their homes and waited for the police, there would have been no murders. If any of the victims had tried to break into the homes, stand your ground would have been a defense. No one, not even a police officer, has the right to shoot some one who is stealing. If you have any binding legal authority to the contrary, lawyer warren, post it.
You girls may want to get a room.
Remember the insult about someone having his head so far up his arse that he needs a periscope to see?
Maxistinkypad is feasting on her own crap.