Chattanooga Now Mind Coffee: Is the third film of a movie trilogy always bad?

Chattanooga Now Mind Coffee: Is the third film of a movie trilogy always bad?

July 20th, 2017 by Shawn Ryan in Chattnow Movies

Just how long can something go before it wears out?

For example, how long can a movie franchise last until it has little — if anything — to offer, until it's just an obvious money-grab?

Take "Despicable Me 3." My wife and I went to see it a couple of weeks ago — the only adults there without a child — and came away pretty unimpressed. We loved the first two "Despicable Me" films (and "Minions," too), but this one was flat, mostly unfunny and not engaging.

Thinking back, though, it seems like many movie franchises wear out their welcome when the third film comes out. Perhaps the filmmakers run out of ideas and just feel like they have to finish the trilogy — "Back to the Future 3," for instance. Sometimes it's obvious they're just trying to milk more money: "Cars 3," "Robocop 3," "Rush Hour 3," "Austin Powers in Goldmember."

Shawn Ryan

Shawn Ryan

Photo by Staff File Photo /Times Free Press.

"Return of the Jedi" was the weakest of the original "Star Wars" series but, conversely, "Revenge of the Sith" was the best of the second series. But when you've got the stunningly boring "The Phantom Menace" and the truly abysmal "Attack of the Clones" in front of you, how good do you have to be to be the best?

In the original "Spider-Man" series, the one with Tobey Maguire, "Spider-Man 3" was weakest. "Iron Man 3" didn't quite hold its own against the other two.

While "Return of the King" won an Oscar for Best Picture, it was more of a prize for all three "Lord of the Rings" movies than just the one. The "The Matrix" trilogy — "The Matrix Revolutions" — was mostly a way to tie up all the loose plot threads.

And "The Godfather III," well, let's not even go there.

But to contradict my entire premise, some of the third movies in a trilogy turn out to be the best of the bunch.

The final film in the Planet of the Apes trilogy, "War for the Planet of the Apes," is generally getting rave reviews. "Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade" was far better than the slapdash "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom."

Some trilogies are good all the way through: the "Dark Knight," "The Lord of the Rings."

Then there are trilogies in which all three movies are a waste of film. Of course, some of these are made to be laughable. For example, "Dungeons and Dragons," "I Know What You Did Last Summer" (and the summer before that and the summer before that) and "Scream."

Trilogies are almost always a roll of the dice. By the time the third film rolls around, which may take years, interest can run thin. If the second film isn't too good, who wants to see a third?

But there was never any reason to make any of the "Ace Ventura" films.

Contact Shawn Ryan at

Getting Started/Comments Policy

Getting started

  1. 1. If you frequently comment on news websites then you may already have a Disqus account. If so, click the "Login" button at the top right of the comment widget and choose whether you'd rather log in with Facebook, Twitter, Google, or a Disqus account.
  2. 2. If you've forgotten your password, Disqus will email you a link that will allow you to create a new one. Easy!
  3. 3. If you're not a member yet, Disqus will go ahead and register you. It's seamless and takes about 10 seconds.
  4. 4. To register, either go through the login process or just click in the box that says "join the discussion," type your comment, and either choose a social media platform to log you in or create a Disqus account with your email address.
  5. 5. If you use Twitter, Facebook or Google to log in, you will need to stay logged into that platform in order to comment. If you create a Disqus account instead, you'll need to remember your Disqus password. Either way, you can change your display name if you'd rather not show off your real name.
  6. 6. Don't be a huge jerk or do anything illegal, and you'll be fine.

Chattanooga Times Free Press Comments Policy

The Chattanooga Times Free Press web sites include interactive areas in which users can express opinions and share ideas and information. We cannot and do not monitor all of the material submitted to the website. Additionally, we do not control, and are not responsible for, content submitted by users. By using the web sites, you may be exposed to content that you may find offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of the Times Free Press web sites and any content on the Times Free Press web sites, including, but not limited to, whether you should rely on such content. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge that we shall have the right (but not the obligation) to review any content that you have submitted to the Times Free Press, and to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content that we determine, in our sole discretion, (a) does not comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement; (b) might violate any law, infringe upon the rights of third parties, or subject us to liability for any reason; or (c) might adversely affect our public image, reputation or goodwill. Moreover, we reserve the right to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content at any time, for the reasons set forth above, for any other reason, or for no reason. If you believe that any content on any of the Times Free Press websites infringes upon any copyrights that you own, please contact us pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (Title 17 U.S.C. § 512) at the following address:

Copyright Agent
The Chattanooga Times Free Press
400 East 11th Street
Chattanooga, TN 37403
Phone: 423-757-6315