Thiessen: The short-term memory of the outrage machine

Thiessen: The short-term memory of the outrage machine

November 8th, 2018 by Marc Thiessen/Washington Post Writers Group in Opinion Free Press Commentary

A Honduran migrant family is allowed to pass through to safety by Mexican Federal Police in riot gear, at the border crossing in Ciudad Hidalgo, Mexico, Friday, Oct. 19, 2018. Central Americans traveling in a mass caravan broke through a Guatemalan border fence and streamed by the thousands toward Mexican territory, defying Mexican authorities' entreaties for an orderly migration and U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of retaliation. (AP Photo/Moises Castillo)

Photo by Associated Press /Times Free Press.

WASHINGTON — When the president announced that he was sending the U.S. military to help secure our Southern border, he received bipartisan praise from members of Congress. The Washington Post reported that the move was seen as "smart politics." The year was 2011, and the president was Barack Obama. The National Guard troops Obama sent to the border as part of "Operation Phalanx" helped apprehend nearly 18,000 illegal immigrants and seized more than 56,000 pounds of illegal drugs.

He was not the only president to deploy troops to the Southern border. In 2006, President George W. Bush launched "Operation Jump Start," in which U.S. National Guard troops assisted in 176,000 immigrant apprehensions, as well as the seizure of almost $900 million illegal drugs. Before that, in 1994, President Bill Clinton launched "Operation Gatekeeper," deploying military personnel to help regain "control" of the San Diego-Tijuana border. Before that, in 1989, President George H.W. Bush established Joint Task Force — Six, deploying the U.S. military to the southwest border region.

But now, when President Trump announces that he is doing precisely what four of his Republican and Democratic predecessors did — sending troops to help secure the Southern border — the liberal outrage machines crank into action, as 108 House Democrats sent a letter to Defense Secretary Jim Mattis declaring "this effort is nothing short of a militarization of the Southern border to score political points and stoke misleading fears among Americans regarding immigrants."

Funny, they didn't say that about Obama, Clinton or either Bush.

Trump's critics say pointing out this history is simply "whataboutism." Sorry, if there was not so much rank hypocrisy among those castigating Trump, there would be no need to say "what about?"

Similarly, when Trump's critics declare he is an anti-Semite because he criticizes liberal billionaire financier George Soros (who happens to be Jewish), it is perfectly legitimate to point out that they had no problem with Democrats' attacks on GOP financier Sheldon Adelson (who also happens to be Jewish). Bernie Sanders castigated "billionaires like Sheldon Adelson buying elections," and Elizabeth Warren declared "Sheldon Adelson can't buy us off." Are they anti-Semites?

And it is perfectly fair to point out that these critics were silent a few weeks ago when former president Clinton shared a stage with Nation of Islam leader, Louis Farrakhan, who has declared, "Hitler was a very great man," and warned Jews, "Don't you forget, when it's God who puts you in the ovens, it's forever!," and most recently compared Jews to "termites." Some even defended Clinton by saying he was simply attending Aretha Franklin's funeral and could not control the guest list. Would Trump's critics have had the same reaction if Trump had attended a funeral where he shared the stage with David Duke? And where was the outrage when Obama took a smiling photograph with Farrakhan, reportedly joking that "He is much better looking than I am"?

Democrats have no problem attending and supporting the Women's March, whose leaders include Linda Sarsour, who declared American Muslims should not "humanize" Israelis, and Tamika Mallory, who has called Farrakhan "the GOAT" (Greatest of All Time). Yet they have the temerity to accuse Trump of anti-Semitism.

The list of liberal hypocrisies goes on. Pointing these things out does not absolve Trump of anything. We can debate whether sending troops to the border is the right thing to do. And the fact that Democrats condone anti-Semites in their own ranks does not release Trump from his responsibility to condemn the bigots in the alt-right.

But if Trump's critics want to be taken seriously, they might want to show some intellectual consistency and hold their own side to the same high moral standards they demand of the president. Otherwise, Americans may get the impression that they are simply using accusations of racism and anti-Semitism as a weapon to silence their political opponents.

The Washington Post Writers Group

Getting Started/Comments Policy

Getting started

  1. 1. If you frequently comment on news websites then you may already have a Disqus account. If so, click the "Login" button at the top right of the comment widget and choose whether you'd rather log in with Facebook, Twitter, Google, or a Disqus account.
  2. 2. If you've forgotten your password, Disqus will email you a link that will allow you to create a new one. Easy!
  3. 3. If you're not a member yet, Disqus will go ahead and register you. It's seamless and takes about 10 seconds.
  4. 4. To register, either go through the login process or just click in the box that says "join the discussion," type your comment, and either choose a social media platform to log you in or create a Disqus account with your email address.
  5. 5. If you use Twitter, Facebook or Google to log in, you will need to stay logged into that platform in order to comment. If you create a Disqus account instead, you'll need to remember your Disqus password. Either way, you can change your display name if you'd rather not show off your real name.
  6. 6. Don't be a huge jerk or do anything illegal, and you'll be fine.

Chattanooga Times Free Press Comments Policy

The Chattanooga Times Free Press web sites include interactive areas in which users can express opinions and share ideas and information. We cannot and do not monitor all of the material submitted to the website. Additionally, we do not control, and are not responsible for, content submitted by users. By using the web sites, you may be exposed to content that you may find offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of the Times Free Press web sites and any content on the Times Free Press web sites, including, but not limited to, whether you should rely on such content. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge that we shall have the right (but not the obligation) to review any content that you have submitted to the Times Free Press, and to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content that we determine, in our sole discretion, (a) does not comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement; (b) might violate any law, infringe upon the rights of third parties, or subject us to liability for any reason; or (c) might adversely affect our public image, reputation or goodwill. Moreover, we reserve the right to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content at any time, for the reasons set forth above, for any other reason, or for no reason. If you believe that any content on any of the Times Free Press websites infringes upon any copyrights that you own, please contact us pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (Title 17 U.S.C. § 512) at the following address:

Copyright Agent
The Chattanooga Times Free Press
400 East 11th Street
Chattanooga, TN 37403
Phone: 423-757-6315