Cooper: An informed school board

Cooper: An informed school board

February 9th, 2018 by Clint Cooper in Opinion Free Press

The allegation of impropriety involving Hamilton County Board of Education attorney Scott Bennett and his alleged interference with an independent report on the culture at Ooltewah High School is not something the board needs as it tries to right the school district ship.

Photo by Angela Lewis Foster /Times Free Press.

It has the appearance of impropriety, and that's the last thing the Hamilton County Board of Education needs.

We're talking about emails that suggest school board attorney Scott Bennett tried to interfere with the conclusions of what was supposed to have been an independent report on the school district's and Ooltewah High School's compliance with sexual harassment policies following a December 2015 assault case involving Ooltewah High School basketball players.

The emails came to light recently as motions are being heard involving lawsuits filed over that incident.

Now, just as they felt they were kept in the dark about details of the initial incident in Gatlinburg, Tenn., during a basketball tournament, board members said they were uncertain about what Bennett may have done or not done, and why.

Related Article

Greeson: More past mistakes mean more work for Hamilton County Schools leaders

Read more

"I need some more information," said District 3 board member Joe Smith, who was not on the board when the initial incident took place.

"I know very little," said District 1 board member Rhonda Thurman, who was on the board at the time.

That's the same thing board members said after news of the rape of one player and harassment of others trickled out. Initially, then-Superintendent Rick Smith and Bennett kept information close to the vest. Board members said they felt at a loss as to what to tell their constituents.

That lack of communication led to sagging support for Smith and ultimately to his resignation.

It couldn't have come at a worse time, either. The district already was reeling from continued low standardized test scores and a withering review from the state on its plan for its most struggling schools.

Thursday, in an executive (non-public) session, board members had their opportunity to have their questions answered and to learn about the consequences of two recent judicial rulings that denied board attorneys more time to depose three expert witnesses and said attorneys "wasted the court's time" by refusing to release evidence that clearly fell under a previous order.

Thurman, for her part, said she "tries [her] best to stay out of it. We'll get all the facts at some point. This is why we pay attorneys."

Although Thurman is correct that "we have no say in it," the board's reputation is on the line. After all, although individual members aren't at risk in the Ooltewah lawsuits, the board is.

Related Article

Federal judge rules against school board for 2nd time in Ooltewah rape civil suits

Read more

We're a little mystified, too, why yesterday's executive session was the first for the body since the beginning of the 2017-2018 school year. Although many of the board members have other jobs, we believe the board should have sought periodic updates from school board attorneys on the cases — if nothing more than to obtain answers to any questions they had.

The appearance of impropriety involving Bennett had its origins in his sound suggestion to the board that, in order to find out more about the culture of Ooltewah High, and its and the district's sexual harassment policies, the board hire an independent attorney to investigate and file a report. The board did so in March 2016, hiring Chattanooga attorney Courtney Bullard to do that work.

When board members waived attorney-client privilege in August 2016 by voting to release the independent report, any correspondence involved in the investigation of the case became fair game and naturally was requested by attorneys for the plaintiffs in the lawsuits.

Since then, exchanges between Bullard and Bennett have been seen in two different lights — the two "openly collaborating" in order to shape the scope of the investigation and in turn reduce the potential culpability of the board (by plaintiffs), and the two corresponding in order for her to give — as requested in her contract — legal advice and periodic updates to the board (by the board's attorneys).

The plaintiffs' lawyers claimed Bennett floated defense theories to Bullard in order to soften the district's "legal exposure," while school board attorneys say Bennett intended her to investigate "the full measure of problems facing the school system."

Although board attorneys originally denied all liability under the federal Title IX statue (that protects against sexual discrimination in education), Bullard found that a violation occurred in the case of one of the harassed — and emotionally injured — players but not in the case of the one who was raped with a pool cue.

However, Bennett, according to plaintiffs, had suggested Bullard to "suppose" the assaults didn't amount to a Title IX violation because they weren't motivated by sexual gratification and weren't sexual violence under Tennessee law (and thus not a Title IX violation).

Her report also found Ooltewah High's hazing training was "deficient" and that a culture of bullying and hazing did occur during the 2015-2016 basketball season.

Any Title IX violations could open the board to more liability.

Going forward, we hope school board members remember the lack of communication that marked the early weeks of the Ooltewah case and always seek to be fully informed about the cases and individuals whose dealings may give them even an appearance of impropriety.

More Ooltewah rape case stories

Getting Started/Comments Policy

Getting started

  1. 1. If you frequently comment on news websites then you may already have a Disqus account. If so, click the "Login" button at the top right of the comment widget and choose whether you'd rather log in with Facebook, Twitter, Google, or a Disqus account.
  2. 2. If you've forgotten your password, Disqus will email you a link that will allow you to create a new one. Easy!
  3. 3. If you're not a member yet, Disqus will go ahead and register you. It's seamless and takes about 10 seconds.
  4. 4. To register, either go through the login process or just click in the box that says "join the discussion," type your comment, and either choose a social media platform to log you in or create a Disqus account with your email address.
  5. 5. If you use Twitter, Facebook or Google to log in, you will need to stay logged into that platform in order to comment. If you create a Disqus account instead, you'll need to remember your Disqus password. Either way, you can change your display name if you'd rather not show off your real name.
  6. 6. Don't be a huge jerk or do anything illegal, and you'll be fine.

Chattanooga Times Free Press Comments Policy

The Chattanooga Times Free Press web sites include interactive areas in which users can express opinions and share ideas and information. We cannot and do not monitor all of the material submitted to the website. Additionally, we do not control, and are not responsible for, content submitted by users. By using the web sites, you may be exposed to content that you may find offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of the Times Free Press web sites and any content on the Times Free Press web sites, including, but not limited to, whether you should rely on such content. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge that we shall have the right (but not the obligation) to review any content that you have submitted to the Times Free Press, and to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content that we determine, in our sole discretion, (a) does not comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement; (b) might violate any law, infringe upon the rights of third parties, or subject us to liability for any reason; or (c) might adversely affect our public image, reputation or goodwill. Moreover, we reserve the right to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content at any time, for the reasons set forth above, for any other reason, or for no reason. If you believe that any content on any of the Times Free Press websites infringes upon any copyrights that you own, please contact us pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (Title 17 U.S.C. § 512) at the following address:

Copyright Agent
The Chattanooga Times Free Press
400 East 11th Street
Chattanooga, TN 37403
Phone: 423-757-6315
Email: webeditor@timesfreepress.com