Cooper: Heading over fiscal cliff

Cooper: Heading over fiscal cliff

July 27th, 2019 by Clint Cooper in Opinion Free Press

The U.S. Capitol is seen from the roof of the Canadian Embassy in Washington, D.C. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Photo by Associated Press /Times Free Press.

The headlines tell us a bipartisan debt and budget bill has been passed in the U.S. House.

Pardon us if we don't stand up and cheer.

Oh, there are positive aspects to it. It means — given U.S. Senate passage and the expected signature of President Donald Trump — we won't have to worry about the threat of a government shutdown for a while or Republicans and Democrats blaming each other for driving us to the brink of a shutdown.

But it extends for two years the fact that no one in Washington, D.C., seems to care if we're driving over a fiscal cliff.

Trump is happy because suspending the amount the United States can borrow and raising the spending caps locked in more money for the military and veterans. Democrats are happy because the bill continued to protect some favored domestic programs. Together it's about $322 billion more in spending for the next two years.

Woo hoo!

Unfortunately, it also means a deficit this year that should top a trillion dollars and a total debt of $22 trillion.

Hey, those are just numbers on paper, right? Wrong.

That means we owe $22 trillion more than we have. It means each year, as the deficit goes up, we have less money available for all the things in the budget that are discretionary. It means the next economic crisis could mean disaster.

Don't look for us to lay this solely at the feet of Democrats, who have not mended their free-spending ways since the days of President Franklin Roosevelt and are the worst kind of hypocrites when they try to blame it all on Trump.

There's plenty of blame for all.

Trump's tax cuts are a part of the problem, but it is a fact that the tax cuts have caused government revenue to rise. It's just that revenue isn't rising enough to offset their long-term affect. But spending is rising even faster, the same way it did following President Ronald Reagan's tax cuts in the 1980s and George W. Bush's tax cuts in the 2000s.

Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tennessee, defended his support for the bill Thursday by saying the "problem is mandatory spending on entitlements, including Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid." It is inappropriate, he said, to blame other spending, mentioning defense, national parks and national laboratories.

The state's senior senator has worked hard on committees to maintain and increase funding for national parks and national laboratories, the first a combined gift to America and the second a needed group working toward medical and other scientific breakthroughs.

But we believe that since there is no movement on entitlement spending, defense spending and non-defense discretionary spending also have to be reined in.

The truth is, though, neither Democrats nor Republicans truly want to see cuts in the annual increases to their most-favored programs, much less actual cuts.

Alexander said the Congressional Budget Office reported discretionary spending had risen at about the rate of inflation for the past 10 years (at least partially due to the 2011 Budget Control Act) and would continue to rise at about the rate of inflation for the next 10 years.

Inflation has risen 18% in 10 years, so a combined spending increase of 20% or so is not an insignificant amount.

Nevertheless, Alexander is right about entitlement spending, and he reminded voters in a news release that he'd once tried to do something about it. In 2013, he and former Tennessee Sen. Bob Corker introduced the Fiscal Sustainability Act, which he said would have reduced the growth of entitlement spending — the growth, mind you, not the spending — by nearly $1 trillion over 10 years.

"The problem," he said, "was that Sen. Corker and I were the only co-sponsors."

In the House Thursday, Republican Reps. Chuck Fleischmann, D-Chattanooga, and David Kustoff, R-Germantown, and Democratic Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Memphis, voted for the bill. Democratic Rep. Jim Cooper, D-Nashville, and the other five Republicans voted against it.

Without any kind of brake on entitlement spending, Alexander said in a speech on the Senate floor Thursday, discretionary spending will decrease from 31% of total federal spending to about 22% in 2029. It is projected that in 2025 the country will spend more on interest on the debt than it spends on the military.

It's an unsustainable course. It's a course, unless it's stopped, that leads to similar economic disasters as have fallen Greece and Venezuela in recent years.

It's a course that, in some way, will require both spending cuts and added revenue, depending on how the pie is to be sliced.

But for today Republicans and Democrats cheer a bipartisan debt and budget bill. And the American people go about their business, staring at the next cat video on their phones, binge watching the latest Netflix series and competing to see who can be the most offended by someone else. Meanwhile, a giant fiscal shadow creeps ever closer.

Getting Started/Comments Policy

Getting started

  1. 1. If you frequently comment on news websites then you may already have a Disqus account. If so, click the "Login" button at the top right of the comment widget and choose whether you'd rather log in with Facebook, Twitter, Google, or a Disqus account.
  2. 2. If you've forgotten your password, Disqus will email you a link that will allow you to create a new one. Easy!
  3. 3. If you're not a member yet, Disqus will go ahead and register you. It's seamless and takes about 10 seconds.
  4. 4. To register, either go through the login process or just click in the box that says "join the discussion," type your comment, and either choose a social media platform to log you in or create a Disqus account with your email address.
  5. 5. If you use Twitter, Facebook or Google to log in, you will need to stay logged into that platform in order to comment. If you create a Disqus account instead, you'll need to remember your Disqus password. Either way, you can change your display name if you'd rather not show off your real name.
  6. 6. Don't be a huge jerk or do anything illegal, and you'll be fine.

Chattanooga Times Free Press Comments Policy

The Chattanooga Times Free Press web sites include interactive areas in which users can express opinions and share ideas and information. We cannot and do not monitor all of the material submitted to the website. Additionally, we do not control, and are not responsible for, content submitted by users. By using the web sites, you may be exposed to content that you may find offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of the Times Free Press web sites and any content on the Times Free Press web sites, including, but not limited to, whether you should rely on such content. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge that we shall have the right (but not the obligation) to review any content that you have submitted to the Times Free Press, and to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content that we determine, in our sole discretion, (a) does not comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement; (b) might violate any law, infringe upon the rights of third parties, or subject us to liability for any reason; or (c) might adversely affect our public image, reputation or goodwill. Moreover, we reserve the right to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content at any time, for the reasons set forth above, for any other reason, or for no reason. If you believe that any content on any of the Times Free Press websites infringes upon any copyrights that you own, please contact us pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (Title 17 U.S.C. § 512) at the following address:

Copyright Agent
The Chattanooga Times Free Press
400 East 11th Street
Chattanooga, TN 37403
Phone: 423-757-6315
Email: webeditor@timesfreepress.com