Cooper: Airport a solar first, but...

Cooper: Airport a solar first, but...

June 21st, 2019 by Clint Cooper in Opinion Free Press

A small plane comes in for a landing on the far side of rows of photovoltaic cells at the Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport as the airport prepared for the second phase of solar panel installations in 2013.

Photo by Jake Daniels /Times Free Press.

The rhetoric flowed fast and friendly Wednesday when Chattanooga airport officials announced they had completed a solar farm to make ours the first airport in the country to generate enough energy to meet its daily power needs.

They variously called the achievement "a model for other airports," "good for environment and our bottom line," and part of a practice that will "change our future."

They were referring to the solar aspect of the arrangement, solar being a "green" energy source and all.

However, 90% of the solar farm was paid for by federal government grants, with Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport picking up the other 10%.

That's not exactly the "model for other airports" we envision.

Oh, we're no solar "deniers," nor do we blame Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport officials for seeking Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grants if they could get them.

The ones for our airport came through Voluntary Airport Low Emission (VALE) grants. VALE grants may be issued to airports that are said to be in non-attainment or maintenance areas. The city is, or was, in a non-attainment area for Particulate Matter 2.5, probably for its heavy manufacturing past, making it eligible for the grants.

No, our gripe about solar energy is its continued subsidy by the federal government.

If the availability of fossil fuels is limited, and we believe it is, and if the production of fossil fuels is worse for the environment than renewable energy sources, and we know it is, we should be looking at making renewable energy so inexpensive that it would be impractical if we didn't use it.

Today, that's not the case, so our belief has always been that fossil fuels should be used, and green sources where practical, until the renewable energy sources become as cheap or cheaper than the fossil fuels.

Some solar advocates say that day has come, so if it has, it makes sense to cut the tie to federal government subsidies. On the other hand, some who push green energy argue, the federal government should continue to subsidize solar energy precisely because it is better for the environment.

We don't believe that's the type of commerce in which the federal government should be involved, though. Energy companies, like other businesses, should compete without federal government assistance. That, we think, is the quickest way to making renewables like solar and wind more competitive in price.

The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, ever so slowly, reduces the subsidy for taxpayers who use solar, fuel cell, wind energy or geothermal heat pumps for their residencies. Their tax credit is 30% for systems placed in service through the end of 2019, 26% for systems placed in service by 2021 and 22% for systems placed in service by 2022.

The reductions are similar for businesses, though the reductions are different for various energy sources. For some types of solar energy, the tax credits fall from 30% through the end of 2019 to 10% by the end of 2022. For other types, they only fall to 22% by the end of 2022.

The FAA website does not indicate that its VALE grants are affected by recent tax legislation, though.

The Chattanooga airport began its $10 million solar array with a first phase in 2010. It was expanded in 2013, at the time producing 85 percent of the airport's energy needs, according to the airport's website. The recently completed third phase finished the project.

The way it works, according to airport officials, is that the solar energy produced from the array — enough, officials said, to power 160,000 light bulbs — is sold to TVA, which then reduces the airport's EPB power bill by the corresponding amount.

The 2.64 megawatt array, located on the southwest corner of the airfield off Jubilee Drive, an area unsuitable for aviation purposes, is one of the largest in the county. It is smaller than an installation generating 9.5 megawatts of electricity at the Volkswagen assembly plant and will be behind a 4.3 megawatt array planned for the top of BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee's headquarters on Cameron Hill.

We're delighted that our airport became the first in the country to generate the equivalent of its power needs, appreciative that airport officials were prescient enough to take advantage of the federal grants, but hope that funding airport energy needs across the country doesn't become one more thing for which federal taxpayers become eternally responsible.

Getting Started/Comments Policy

Getting started

  1. 1. If you frequently comment on news websites then you may already have a Disqus account. If so, click the "Login" button at the top right of the comment widget and choose whether you'd rather log in with Facebook, Twitter, Google, or a Disqus account.
  2. 2. If you've forgotten your password, Disqus will email you a link that will allow you to create a new one. Easy!
  3. 3. If you're not a member yet, Disqus will go ahead and register you. It's seamless and takes about 10 seconds.
  4. 4. To register, either go through the login process or just click in the box that says "join the discussion," type your comment, and either choose a social media platform to log you in or create a Disqus account with your email address.
  5. 5. If you use Twitter, Facebook or Google to log in, you will need to stay logged into that platform in order to comment. If you create a Disqus account instead, you'll need to remember your Disqus password. Either way, you can change your display name if you'd rather not show off your real name.
  6. 6. Don't be a huge jerk or do anything illegal, and you'll be fine.

Chattanooga Times Free Press Comments Policy

The Chattanooga Times Free Press web sites include interactive areas in which users can express opinions and share ideas and information. We cannot and do not monitor all of the material submitted to the website. Additionally, we do not control, and are not responsible for, content submitted by users. By using the web sites, you may be exposed to content that you may find offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of the Times Free Press web sites and any content on the Times Free Press web sites, including, but not limited to, whether you should rely on such content. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge that we shall have the right (but not the obligation) to review any content that you have submitted to the Times Free Press, and to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content that we determine, in our sole discretion, (a) does not comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement; (b) might violate any law, infringe upon the rights of third parties, or subject us to liability for any reason; or (c) might adversely affect our public image, reputation or goodwill. Moreover, we reserve the right to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content at any time, for the reasons set forth above, for any other reason, or for no reason. If you believe that any content on any of the Times Free Press websites infringes upon any copyrights that you own, please contact us pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (Title 17 U.S.C. § 512) at the following address:

Copyright Agent
The Chattanooga Times Free Press
400 East 11th Street
Chattanooga, TN 37403
Phone: 423-757-6315
Email: webeditor@timesfreepress.com


Loading...