Cooper: Lawsuits to right media ship?

Cooper: Lawsuits to right media ship?

March 15th, 2019 by Clint Cooper in Opinion Free Press

Nick Sandmann, in red hat at center, stands in front of a Native American activist as the teen waits for his bus following a pro-life rally at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C.

Photo by Contributed Photo /Times Free Press.

Could a 16-year-old Catholic school student be the catalyst that returns the national media from advocacy back to impartial journalism?

Lawyers for Nick Sandmann, a name many Americans now recognize for being wrongly accused of confronting a Native American activist while waiting for his school's bus at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 18, have filed a $275 million suit against CNN for making their client the focus of wrong-doing.

They previously filed suit against The Washington Post for doing the same thing.

"Our plan is to come out with an additional lawsuit every few weeks or months," lawyer Todd McMurtry told the "Todd Starnes Radio Show" earlier this week. "But right now we're looking very carefully at NBC, AP, HBO. And again, HBO is primarily because they carried Bill Maher's disgusting comments about Nicholas Sandmann. So these probably are the next three defendants."

On the surface, you might consider the consecutive lawsuits, the amount of the CNN filing and the plans for additional litigation, and believe the attorneys are — themselves — making a mockery of the situation.

But we believe it is going to take something momentous to jolt national media outlets that have jumped so far outside their goal — which should be impartiality — back on track. Settlements of $275 million against one, two, three, four, five or more sources might send that message.

And let's face it, many more subjects are out there who have been wronged because members of the media did not like what they stood for. But the subjects didn't have the connections, the time, the money or the wherewithal to seek counsel and determine what is necessary to take a big swing at their pursuers.

The pseudo criminal element in Sandmann's January incident was his hat — a red cap with the words "Make America Great Again" stitched on it. Nothing infuriates the left wing and its national media partners more than that hat.

It's a reminder that they — Democrats and the national media — could not do what was supposed to be the simple act of defeating one Donald J. Trump in the 2016 presidential race. It's a reminder that their polls were wrong, their understanding of the electorate was wrong and their confidence in Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton was misplaced.

Since then, now more than two years later, heaping criticism on Trump, his policies and his supporters has been their raison d'état.

Which brings us to Sandmann, who short video clips seemed to indicate was confronting an elderly American Indian activist. But longer clips show Sandmann's group already had been harassed by another group and that he was just trying to defuse the situation — with an enigmatic smirk that only seemed to further make him the villain — when the activist confronted him.

The news outlets mentioned above, once the red hat had been identified (and the boy's attendance at a pro-life rally), ran with the kid-as-the-bad-guy story. They didn't bother to investigate or to double- and triple-check their sources, once standard journalistic practices. They were on air and in print before the truth could be proven.

The first suit filed by Sandmann's counsel, against The Washington Post, said the newspaper practiced "a modern-day form of McCarthyism" by targeting the teen and "using its vast financial resources to enter the bully pulpit by publishing a series of false and defamatory print and online articles ... to smear a young boy who was, in its view, an acceptable casualty in their war against the president."

Since then, the newspaper published an editor's note admitting subsequent information either contradicted or failed to confirm accounts relayed in its initial article about the video.

The CNN suit filed this week said the cable news network "elevated false, heinous accusations of racist conduct" against Sandmann and failed to adhere to "well-established journalistic standards and ethics." The network has yet to apologize or retract information.

As for Maher, on the HBO show "Real Time with Bill Maher," the host said, "I don't blame the kid, the smirk-face kid. I blame lead poisoning and bad parenting. And, oh yeah, I blame the f—-ing kid, what a little pr—-. Smirk face, like that's not a d—- move at any age to stick your face in this elderly man."

He followed that with a crude reference to the non-related Catholic Church sex scandal, saying he "does not get what Catholic priests see in these kids."

McMurtry said in an interview with Fox News that the aim of the suits is what this page believes all Americans should want — to change the "mainstream media's" behavior.

"Clearly what we want to do is stop them from behaving in a way that discards all journalistic integrity," he said. "Here they didn't investigate. They took something off Twitter and put it right into the media."

Trust in media fell to an all-time low in 2016, with only 32 percent of Americans saying they report the news "fully, accurately and fairly." It has recovered slightly since then, but the Sandmann story and the subsequent Jussie Smollett incident are likely to sink it again.

We would hope the goal of having the public trust outweighs that of the media's desire to hurt Trump, but we're not convinced. If it has to take lawsuit settlements in the hundreds of millions of dollars to get them to change, that's regrettable. But so be it.

Getting Started/Comments Policy

Getting started

  1. 1. If you frequently comment on news websites then you may already have a Disqus account. If so, click the "Login" button at the top right of the comment widget and choose whether you'd rather log in with Facebook, Twitter, Google, or a Disqus account.
  2. 2. If you've forgotten your password, Disqus will email you a link that will allow you to create a new one. Easy!
  3. 3. If you're not a member yet, Disqus will go ahead and register you. It's seamless and takes about 10 seconds.
  4. 4. To register, either go through the login process or just click in the box that says "join the discussion," type your comment, and either choose a social media platform to log you in or create a Disqus account with your email address.
  5. 5. If you use Twitter, Facebook or Google to log in, you will need to stay logged into that platform in order to comment. If you create a Disqus account instead, you'll need to remember your Disqus password. Either way, you can change your display name if you'd rather not show off your real name.
  6. 6. Don't be a huge jerk or do anything illegal, and you'll be fine.

Chattanooga Times Free Press Comments Policy

The Chattanooga Times Free Press web sites include interactive areas in which users can express opinions and share ideas and information. We cannot and do not monitor all of the material submitted to the website. Additionally, we do not control, and are not responsible for, content submitted by users. By using the web sites, you may be exposed to content that you may find offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of the Times Free Press web sites and any content on the Times Free Press web sites, including, but not limited to, whether you should rely on such content. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge that we shall have the right (but not the obligation) to review any content that you have submitted to the Times Free Press, and to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content that we determine, in our sole discretion, (a) does not comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement; (b) might violate any law, infringe upon the rights of third parties, or subject us to liability for any reason; or (c) might adversely affect our public image, reputation or goodwill. Moreover, we reserve the right to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content at any time, for the reasons set forth above, for any other reason, or for no reason. If you believe that any content on any of the Times Free Press websites infringes upon any copyrights that you own, please contact us pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (Title 17 U.S.C. § 512) at the following address:

Copyright Agent
The Chattanooga Times Free Press
400 East 11th Street
Chattanooga, TN 37403
Phone: 423-757-6315