Cooper's Eye on the Left: It's a crisis, it's a crisis

Cooper's Eye on the Left: It's a crisis, it's a crisis

May 13th, 2019 by Clint Cooper in Opinion Free Press

A group starter by former Vice President Al Gore has decided it needs to tell news networks how to describe climate change.

Photo by Heiko Junge

How it starts

The Climate Reality Project, an activist group founded by former Vice President Al Gore in 2006, has decided it needs to dictate to the news networks how to report on climate.

In an online petition, it seeks the public to force ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC and Fox News to change their ways. They're not calling it a crisis or an emergency, you see.

"When stronger storms and hotter wildfires leave millions homeless, it's a crisis," the organization said. "When runaway global warming threatens our food and water, it's a crisis. When our kids walk out of school because their future is at stake, it's a crisis. But the coverage we see on television doesn't match the reality outside our windows."

Only 3.5% of news segments use the right words, the group maintained. It also likes the term "urgent, existential threat."

"It's a crisis," the organization said in a tweet. "It's time to call it a climate crisis."

When you begin to hear the words from the sheep-like national media, you'll know the group has gotten through.


They didn't get the message

CNN thought it had the perfect set-up to spew more hate on President Donald Trump recently when host Don Lemon had as guests the black pastors of two Louisiana churches torched in hate-motivated acts allegedly committed by the son of a local sheriff's deputy.

Vice President Vice President Mike Pence had visited the men, so criticism for the administration was expected to be teed up. But the pastors wouldn't take the bait.

"Today the vice president visited the site and your church," Lemon said. "How do you feel about support you've received from the Trump White House?"

"It's satisfying and it's uplifting," the Rev. Gerald Toussaint of Mount Pleasant Baptist said, adding that they are "reassured right now because of the reaction that we're getting, especially the visit of Vice President Mike Pence."

Foiled, Lemon suggested Trump had received "criticism" for not speaking out sooner.

"Well, I'm optimistic, Don," the Rev. Harry Richard of Greater Union Baptist said. "I feel like after this tragedy the country is coming together. I appreciate the fact that Mr. Trump did acknowledge the fact that we had this tragedy down here in Louisiana and I was encouraged today when Mr. Pence came and visited with us. I respect our leadership. One thing I know, Don, that if you're going to be a leader, you've got to acknowledge the suffering of Christ. If that's where his heart is I believe that we are going to be helped."

Lemon tried one more time, but the pastors would have none of it. Evidently, they preferred truth to spin.


RBG popularity flagging?

Senate Democrats looking for a slam dunk recently took to Twitter to ask whether people wanted to see more Supreme Court justices like Ruth Bader Ginsburg or more like Brett Kavanaugh. In other words, they were asking on a liberal platform whether people wanted more justices like liberal icon Ginsburg or the hated-by-the-left Kavanaugh, who Democrats falsely accused of sexual assault in his confirmation hearings last summer.

Well, for whatever reason, it didn't pan out as intended. After just shy of 160,000 votes, Kavanaugh had an almost 70-30 lead.

Perhaps to encourage its Twitter supporters, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee tweeted that "progress" was being erased by President Donald Trump's picks for the judiciary.

The president's son, Donald Trump Jr., tweeted, "Something tells me that this probably wasn't the result Democrats were hoping for when they decided to do this poll."

Sensing an embarrassment, the party that would like to see direct popular voting decide the presidency just deleted the tweet.

Never happened. Problem solved.


Well, that settles it

Comments last week by U.S. Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-New York, indicate U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez hasn't cornered the market on New York congressional representatives not ready for prime time.

Jeffries, during a session of the House Judiciary Committee, said the report by special counsel Robert Mueller shows Moscow "artificially" placed President Donald Trump in the White House.

"Seventeen different intelligence agencies have concluded that Russia interfered with our election, attacked our democracy for the sole purpose of artificially placing someone at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue," he said. "They were successful, and that's also what the Mueller report shows."

Of course, the report concluded decisively there was no collusion between Russia and Trump.

Jeffries later tweeted that Mueller is a Republican, which apparently was supposed to indicate he wasn't afraid to finger his fellow party member.

But, the report concluded...Never mind, it would only confuse him.

Getting Started/Comments Policy

Getting started

  1. 1. If you frequently comment on news websites then you may already have a Disqus account. If so, click the "Login" button at the top right of the comment widget and choose whether you'd rather log in with Facebook, Twitter, Google, or a Disqus account.
  2. 2. If you've forgotten your password, Disqus will email you a link that will allow you to create a new one. Easy!
  3. 3. If you're not a member yet, Disqus will go ahead and register you. It's seamless and takes about 10 seconds.
  4. 4. To register, either go through the login process or just click in the box that says "join the discussion," type your comment, and either choose a social media platform to log you in or create a Disqus account with your email address.
  5. 5. If you use Twitter, Facebook or Google to log in, you will need to stay logged into that platform in order to comment. If you create a Disqus account instead, you'll need to remember your Disqus password. Either way, you can change your display name if you'd rather not show off your real name.
  6. 6. Don't be a huge jerk or do anything illegal, and you'll be fine.

Chattanooga Times Free Press Comments Policy

The Chattanooga Times Free Press web sites include interactive areas in which users can express opinions and share ideas and information. We cannot and do not monitor all of the material submitted to the website. Additionally, we do not control, and are not responsible for, content submitted by users. By using the web sites, you may be exposed to content that you may find offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of the Times Free Press web sites and any content on the Times Free Press web sites, including, but not limited to, whether you should rely on such content. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge that we shall have the right (but not the obligation) to review any content that you have submitted to the Times Free Press, and to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content that we determine, in our sole discretion, (a) does not comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement; (b) might violate any law, infringe upon the rights of third parties, or subject us to liability for any reason; or (c) might adversely affect our public image, reputation or goodwill. Moreover, we reserve the right to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content at any time, for the reasons set forth above, for any other reason, or for no reason. If you believe that any content on any of the Times Free Press websites infringes upon any copyrights that you own, please contact us pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (Title 17 U.S.C. § 512) at the following address:

Copyright Agent
The Chattanooga Times Free Press
400 East 11th Street
Chattanooga, TN 37403
Phone: 423-757-6315