Journalist Ginia Bellafante hit the nail on the head Thursday when she tweeted that the overused phrase "historic weather event" must be retired.
"It gives the ongoing climate catastrophe the hint of something novel and fun."
The destruction of two major office towers in New York City 20 years ago was never called a "historic airplane event"; the destruction of two major cities in Japan in 1945 was not a "historic atomic event."
Instead, these "events" were immediately understood as parts of the larger global horrors of terrorism and war. The climate crisis, too, must be addressed not as a series of one-off inconveniences - the current fires in California and the floods in New York - but as a global convulsion that is already structuring our geopolitics, our everyday lives, our futures.
One way to comprehend the planetary convulsion is to consider the map The New York Times generated last week using data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
The map divides the nation by warm and cool colors. The variations don't signal political affiliations. They don't indicate who does and doesn't "believe" in the climate crisis. They stand for something much more elemental: fire and water.
The data capture the 30-year change in annual average precipitation across the United States, and it's staggering. Half of the nation has been grappling with drought while the other gets inundated.
The too-scorched West gives way to the drowned East across a surprisingly clear border that runs down the middle of the Dakotas and cuts through Texas.
Left of the line, there are a lot of amber hues, indicating that rainfall has decreased by between 1 and 5 inches since 1991.
To the right, it's largely medium to dark aqua green. Rainfall in these areas has increased by between 2 and 5 inches in the same period. The exception is a swath of the Southern states - chiefly Georgia, North Carolina and northern Florida - that in places are about as dehydrated as Arizona.
In short, the map gives context to the West Coast's consuming fires, the lethal storm surges in Louisiana, the flash floods in Tennessee and the Hurricane Ida aftermath that flooded houses and closed schools in New York this week.
It all adds up to a century that has broken out of the steadier weather patterns of the past, in which flood and drought were indeed "events." It signals a breakdown of climate but, more important, a breakdown of American government and industry, which have utterly failed over the last 50 years to modify a rapacious economy that still depends on gouging stuff out of the earth and burning it.
Our sea-to-shining-sea nation is becoming less and less habitable. Those with means may move farther north, but even in Canada, projected precipitation maps are ominous. Almost no part of the North American continent is safe from fires or floods.
How to prepare? A famous 2007 quote by John Holdren, then Barack Obama's senior science adviser, is apt: "We basically have tree choices: mitigation, adaptation and suffering. We're going to do some of each. The question is what the mix is going to be."
In the name of reducing the suffering, we had better start mitigating and adapting fast. The checklist is simple but drastic. Stop taking fossil fuel from the ground and burning it, shrink livestock farming, switch to sustainable electricity. Build raised houses, relocate farms and plant heat-tolerant trees. Admit it's happening.
The single remaining hope is that Americans will not see the amber-to-green evidence as a pretext for more infighting and blame but rather as a call to common sense, pragmatic action and moral responsibility. Mitigation and adaptation are vitally important, but only a more humane society will help us care for one another in the crisis that stretches before us.
The Los Angeles Times