As the news shifts, many Americans may think the Afghan war is over.
Not so. The searing scenes of Kabul's fall are having a powerful impact on America's global image.
Chinese and Russian propaganda outlets are gleefully trumpeting scenes of America's "defeat." NATO allies who had troops in Afghanistan are bitter that they were forced to leave Afghan staff and their own nationals - because President Joe Biden didn't consult them.
And the final U.S. defeat - set in motion by former President Donald Trump's surrender treaty with the Taliban and finalized by Biden's exit - raises questions about whom and what our country is willing to fight for.
Here are some questions I believe should be answered.
* Why was the exit from Kabul so disastrous?
Whether or not you think Biden should have pulled out U.S. troops, this question must be dissected. White House efforts to spin the U.S. military's herculean last-minute efforts cannot obscure the fact of Taliban victory.
The evacuation chaos has fed a perception by allies and enemies of U.S. incompetence that started with Trump over COVID-19 failures, and has been advanced by conservatives' vaccine refusal and global warming denial. Now the messy exit from Kabul is added to the evidence list.
How could U.S. intelligence have failed so badly - when the string of Taliban victories after Biden's withdrawal announcement in mid-April was so unrelenting? Was this a case of White House willful blindness or of bureaucratic blundering?
In 2009, I watched NATO trainers struggle on the vast and desolate grounds of the Kabul Military Training Center, at the outskirts of the city. Seventy percent of the recruits couldn't read. And new Afghan soldiers told me frankly that they hated M-16s because they needed so much maintenance whereas Soviet-era AK-47s were far more dependable.
Washington trained an army to U.S. standards, including an air force that needed U.S. maintenance. U.S. military officials warned repeatedly that the Afghan air force - critical to support its ground troops - would collapse if Washington pulled all troops out.
Surely the State Department and the National Security Council knew these facts, yet the White House was caught flat-footed by the Taliban as we exited. Why?
* What are Americans now prepared to fight for?
"This decision about Afghanistan is not just about Afghanistan. It's about ending an era of major military operations to remake other countries," Biden told Americans last week. Fair enough.
But has the White House faced the consequences of that admission? The president champions democratic values in contrast to the authoritarianism of China and Russia. How does this square with abandoning the Afghan women activists, journalists and human rights workers who adopted those values?
* Where and when will America be willing to use military force in the future?
Any "over-the-horizon" efforts to prevent the Taliban from hosting terrorist groups aren't likely to be successful: We now have no U.S. or Afghan eyes on the ground, and the nearest U.S. bases are many hours away.
And, after the fall of Kabul, our allies in Europe, the Mideast, and Asia are asking whether we still have their backs against Russia, Iran, and China.
During her visit to Singapore in late August, Vice President Kamala Harris accused China of "intimidation" in the South China Sea and asserted that the U.S. "stands with our allies and our partners." Does it? Seoul, Tokyo, and Taipei need reassurance, along with South Asian allis.
* Can America rebuild its image?
For moral and geopolitical reasons, the White House needs to demonstrate that it won't abandon American citizens and allies in Afghanistan. They are now virtual hostages, and the Taliban will demand economic prizes. But who trusts an ally who leaves its friends and citizens behind?
The White House also needs to remove its own blinders, and squarely face the causes and consequences of the Kabul debacle. Only then can it begin to convince the world that this was not one more step toward America's inevitable decline.
The Philadelphia Inquirer