Case: Some fish and game regulations leave you scratching your head

Case: Some fish and game regulations leave you scratching your head

July 3rd, 2019 by Larry Case in Sports - Outdoors

A bull elk, left, keeps a watchful eye on a herd of cow elk in Rocky Mountain National Park near Estes Park, Colo. Federal land in western states provides hunting ground for big game and trophy game, but the access to such opportunities isn't equal for those coming from out of state.

Photo by Associated Press /Times Free Press.

Elk roam among the homes outside the east entrance to Rocky Mountain National Park in Estes Park, Colo. Big game hunting opportunities in the United States also come with laws and regulations not everyone agrees with, writes outdoors columnist Larry Case.

Elk roam among the homes outside the east...

Photo by Associated Press /Times Free Press.

Benjamin Franklin said it best: "Honesty is the best policy." I think he meant we should just be honest about things and fess up, and Ol' Ben was pretty wise about most matters, so here goes.

Many of you know I spent more than 35 years as a conservation officer and did a lot of law enforcement in the hunting, fishing and wildlife realm. Sometimes it was a lot of fun, sometimes it could be dangerous and sometimes dealing with the public could make you develop a nervous tic.

Keeping with the honesty theme here, one of the things that used to bug me was when people would complain about how dumb some of the game laws are. This was especially true when they did not understand the particular law (often), or when they gave no thought as to why it might be on the books in the first place (even more often).

Here is the thing, though, that is hard for an old game warden like me to admit: Sometimes they were right.

Larry Case

Larry Case

Photo by Contributed Photo /Times Free Press.

When you think about it, we shouldn't be surprised if we have some crazy laws dealing with fish and game. In a land that has too many laws to begin with, our nation has some strange regulations on just about everything. So maybe we should look at some of the wildlife and hunting laws that raise eyebrows.

One involves the inequality of nonresidents for hunting tags on federal land.

OK, I get it: Western states with all of the elk, mule deer, sheep and goats want to take care of their resident hunters. The problem is much of this hunting occurs on federal land, most of it handled by the U.S. Forest Service or the Bureau of Land Management.

Like me, most hunters figure this land belongs to all of us who are citizens of the United States. Many out-of-state hunters believe the tags allotted for various animals on this land go heavily in the favor of that state's residents. If the hunting is to occur on federal land, then why aren't the tags given out equally? Most western states give about 80% of their big-game tags to residents and about 20% to nonresidents.

One argument for this is that while the land itself is federally owned, the animals on that land (as in all of the United States) belong to and are entrusted to the state, so the state should have a say in how the tags are allotted. That is a pretty good argument for how it is done now, but stubborn hardheads (like me) aren't buying it.

You can imagine where most residents of these states land on this: If you want to have the benefits of resident hunters, you need to move here.

A similar law in Wyoming has a lot of tongues wagging. In order for a nonresident to hunt big game (deer, elk, moose, mountain goats and sheep) or trophy game (black bears, cougars and wolves) on the 3 million acres of federal land in the Cowboy State, you must hire a guide or have a resident companion who possesses a noncommercial Wyoming guide license. If you want to hike, fish, bird watch or hunt small game in the same area, no guide is needed.

Does that pass the smell test for you? It doesn't for me and a lot of other people. Can inexperienced nonresident hunters get into trouble in wilderness areas? Absolutely. Could novice resident hunters get in similar trouble? You bet. Are hikers and small game hunters less likely to "get into trouble" than big game hunters? I don't know. You tell me.

Please don't take this to mean I am slamming outfitters in any way, because most of them provide a great service for many sportsmen. (If you are interested in learning more, there is an intriguing discussion about this on outdoorsman Steven Rinella's website,

These are far from the only laws hunters love to hate.

Is having a plug in your semi-automatic or pump shotgun necessary? This has been around for a long time. It is a federal law for waterfowl and may be needed for that, but do you really need to shoot more than three times in most hunting situations? In some of the new laws for hunting nuisance snow geese, this requirement has been nixed. Some states require this for all shotgun hunting; some don't.

I have written about baiting laws before. Should it be illegal to place corn or other bait in the ground to hunt animals when you can hunt adjacent to a standing corn field? How about a cornfield that has just been cut and has kernels spread all over? How about hunting over a water hole or an apple tree? Is that the same as bait?

In some states I can bait for one animal, such as deer, but not others — say, bear or turkeys. Is that OK?

I'm not supplying any answers here. You be the judge.

This list goes on, and I can see a need to address this again in the future. Why is it OK to catch a fish on a rod-and-reel in many places but not with your hands or a dip net? Is it ethics and just being sportsmanlike? If the limit of deer or turkeys is three — or whatever number — per season, why in some places are you allowed to take only one per day? If you had the opportunity to take all three in one day, wouldn't the result be the same?

I have hard-and-fast, biased opinions on all of this, but I ain't saying — I'm asking you.

Once again I hope to have supplied you with something to fight about in the barber shop and around the water cooler.

You're welcome.

"The Trail Less Traveled" is written by Larry Case, who lives in Fayette County, W.Va. You can write to him at

Getting Started/Comments Policy

Getting started

  1. 1. If you frequently comment on news websites then you may already have a Disqus account. If so, click the "Login" button at the top right of the comment widget and choose whether you'd rather log in with Facebook, Twitter, Google, or a Disqus account.
  2. 2. If you've forgotten your password, Disqus will email you a link that will allow you to create a new one. Easy!
  3. 3. If you're not a member yet, Disqus will go ahead and register you. It's seamless and takes about 10 seconds.
  4. 4. To register, either go through the login process or just click in the box that says "join the discussion," type your comment, and either choose a social media platform to log you in or create a Disqus account with your email address.
  5. 5. If you use Twitter, Facebook or Google to log in, you will need to stay logged into that platform in order to comment. If you create a Disqus account instead, you'll need to remember your Disqus password. Either way, you can change your display name if you'd rather not show off your real name.
  6. 6. Don't be a huge jerk or do anything illegal, and you'll be fine.

Chattanooga Times Free Press Comments Policy

The Chattanooga Times Free Press web sites include interactive areas in which users can express opinions and share ideas and information. We cannot and do not monitor all of the material submitted to the website. Additionally, we do not control, and are not responsible for, content submitted by users. By using the web sites, you may be exposed to content that you may find offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of the Times Free Press web sites and any content on the Times Free Press web sites, including, but not limited to, whether you should rely on such content. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge that we shall have the right (but not the obligation) to review any content that you have submitted to the Times Free Press, and to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content that we determine, in our sole discretion, (a) does not comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement; (b) might violate any law, infringe upon the rights of third parties, or subject us to liability for any reason; or (c) might adversely affect our public image, reputation or goodwill. Moreover, we reserve the right to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content at any time, for the reasons set forth above, for any other reason, or for no reason. If you believe that any content on any of the Times Free Press websites infringes upon any copyrights that you own, please contact us pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (Title 17 U.S.C. § 512) at the following address:

Copyright Agent
The Chattanooga Times Free Press
400 East 11th Street
Chattanooga, TN 37403
Phone: 423-757-6315