Skip to main content
Sunday, November 15, 2026Nov 15

New York Times: Surprise, Mr. President. John Bolton has the goods.

File photo by Doug Mills of The New York Times / John Bolton, then the national security adviser, looks on as President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the Oval Office on Aug. 20, 2019.
File photo by Doug Mills of The New York Times / John Bolton, then the national security adviser, looks on as President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the Oval Office on Aug. 20, 2019.

It’s just possible that common sense and reality have a shot at prying open the doors to the Senate chamber after all. After Republican senators claimed that it was perfectly reasonable to put a U.S. president on trial without hearing from any witnesses, a few of them are showing signs of recognizing that the truth matters. Or, at least, that the American people believe it does.

What’s changed? Shocking but not surprising revelations from John Bolton’s book manuscript, which The New York Times reported over the weekend, have made impossible to ignore what everyone has known for months: President Donald Trump withheld hundreds of millions of dollars in military aid to Ukraine to benefit himself politically, and against the strenuous objections of his top aides and both parties in Congress.

On Monday morning, Sen. Mitt Romney, of Utah, said, “I think it’s increasingly likely that other Republicans will join those of us who think we should hear from John Bolton.”

It’s refreshing to hear those words. And yet the fact that such a statement is noteworthy at all tells you how far from responsible governance Republicans have strayed. They hold 53 seats in the Senate, and yet the nation is waiting on just four – four!- to do the right thing and agree to call Bolton, the former national security adviser, and other key witnesses to testify in Trump’s impeachment trial.

A far more representative attitude in the Republican caucus was expressed by Sen. Roy Blunt, of Missouri, who said Monday, “Unless there’s a witness that’s going to change the outcome, I can’t imagine why we’d want to stretch this out for weeks and months.”