Skip to main content
Sunday, November 15, 2026Nov 15

Prosecutor: No federal charges in police killing in Memphis

FILE - In this July 13, 2016 file photo, Henry Williams, father of Darrius Stewart, talks about his son on the courthouse steps, in Memphis, Tenn.  U.S. Attorney Edward Stanton told reporters, Tuesday, Sept. 27, 2016,  that a federal review found insufficient evidence to file charges in the July 2015 shooting of Darrius Stewart by Officer Connor Schilling. Stanton added that the federal review by the Justice Department found that Schilling did not willfully deprive Stewart of his rights. (Mike Brown/The Commercial Appeal via AP)
FILE - In this July 13, 2016 file photo, Henry Williams, father of Darrius Stewart, talks about his son on the courthouse steps, in Memphis, Tenn. U.S. Attorney Edward Stanton told reporters, Tuesday, Sept. 27, 2016, that a federal review found insufficient evidence to file charges in the July 2015 shooting of Darrius Stewart by Officer Connor Schilling. Stanton added that the federal review by the Justice Department found that Schilling did not willfully deprive Stewart of his rights. (Mike Brown/The Commercial Appeal via AP)

MEMPHIS, Tenn. (AP) – A white Memphis police officer won’t face federal civil rights charges in the shooting death of a 19-year-old black man, the federal government announced Tuesday.

U.S. Attorney Edward Stanton told reporters that a federal review found insufficient evidence to file charges in the 2015 shooting of Darrius Stewart by Officer Connor Schilling. Stanton added that the review by the Justice Department found that Schilling did not willfully or with a “bad purpose” deprive Stewart of his rights.

The Justice Department announced in December that it was reviewing the shooting, which had sparked peaceful protests in Memphis. Stewart’s shooting occurred in the months after the deaths of black men at the hands of police in Missouri, New York and elsewhere aggravated racial tensions in the country.

Stanton said that federal prosecutors and FBI agents reviewed witness statements, video footage and other information during their investigation.

“Based on the eye-witness accounts, the statement of the officer involved, the video, and the physical evidence, there is insufficient evidence to disprove Schilling’s assertion that he needed to use deadly force against Stewart,” Stanton said.