Skip to main content
Saturday, November 14, 2026Nov 14

US argues Meta built a social media monopoly

FILE — The Meta Store in Burlingame, Calif., Jan. 7, 2025. On Monday, Meta will face off against the federal government in a landmark antitrust trial over claims that it illegally squashed competition by buying Instagram and WhatsApp. (Jason Henry/The New York Times).
FILE — The Meta Store in Burlingame, Calif., Jan. 7, 2025. On Monday, Meta will face off against the federal government in a landmark antitrust trial over claims that it illegally squashed competition by buying Instagram and WhatsApp. (Jason Henry/The New York Times).

WASHINGTON — The Federal Trade Commission on Monday accused Meta of creating a monopoly that squelched competition by buying startups that stood in its way, kicking off a landmark antitrust trial that could dismantle a social media empire that has transformed how the world connects online.

In a packed courtroom in the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia, the FTC opened its first antitrust trial under the Trump administration by arguing that Meta illegally cemented a monopoly in social networking by acquiring Instagram and WhatsApp when they were tiny startups. Those actions were part of a “buy-or-bury strategy,” the FTC said.

Ultimately, the purchases coalesced Meta’s power, depriving consumers of other social networking options and edging out competition, the government said.

“For more than 100 years, American public policy has insisted firms must compete if they want to succeed,” said Daniel Matheson, the FTC’s lead litigator in the case, in his opening remarks. “The reason we are here is that Meta broke the deal.”

“They decided that competition was too hard and it would be easier to buy out their rivals than to compete with them,” he added.