Skip to main content
Saturday, November 14, 2026Nov 14

Dr. Oz mounts spirited defense against critical letter

FILE - In this June 17, 2014, file photo, Dr. Mehmet Oz, vice chairman and professor of surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington. Oz is fighting back against critics who are trying to get him removed from a faculty position at Columbia University. Dr. Mehmet Oz will air an episode of his syndicated talk show on Thursday that specifically takes on the group of 10 doctors from around the country who wrote to a Columbia dean about him. The group suggested last week that Oz promotes “quack treatments” of weight loss supplements with no scientific proof that they work. (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke, File)
FILE - In this June 17, 2014, file photo, Dr. Mehmet Oz, vice chairman and professor of surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington. Oz is fighting back against critics who are trying to get him removed from a faculty position at Columbia University. Dr. Mehmet Oz will air an episode of his syndicated talk show on Thursday that specifically takes on the group of 10 doctors from around the country who wrote to a Columbia dean about him. The group suggested last week that Oz promotes “quack treatments” of weight loss supplements with no scientific proof that they work. (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke, File)

NEW YORK (AP) – Dr. Mehmet Oz says last week’s attack by 10 doctors who accused him of promoting “quack treatments” on his TV show was spurred by his vocal support for labeling genetically modified foods – a stance he says some if not all of those accusers oppose.

Oz devoted the first half of his syndicated show on Thursday to his response to what he called “a brazen letter from 10 mysterious doctors” sent to Columbia University, where Oz serves as vice chairman of the surgery department and performs heart surgery at Columbia’s affiliated hospital. The letter accused him of an “egregious lack of integrity” and urged the university to remove him from its faculty.

A Columbia spokesman defended Oz by saying the school is “committed to the principle of academic freedom.”

But the letter set off a new round of criticism of Oz, who in the past has been slammed for promoting questionable cure-alls and last June appeared before the Senate’s consumer protection panel, where he was scolded for claims he had made on his show about weight-loss aids – claims he says he has since stopped making.

New Yorker staff writer Michael Specter, who profiled Oz for that magazine two years ago, said on NPR this week that, whereas every doctor’s first obligation is to do no harm, Oz “does harm every time he goes on the air by recommending things for which there is no evidence, and things often that he knows not to be true.”