WASHINGTON – As Republicans head toward what could be a stalemated convention, they might recall how the party healed itself in 1952 in what was known as the “winter of discontent.” The GOP drafted a military leader, Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, as their presidential candidate.
The looming showdown between Donald Trump and Ted Cruz is a potential “train wreck,” to quote my colleague Charles Krauthammer. Neither front-runner seems likely to have the 1,237 delegates needed for a first-ballot victory. An eventual win by either Trump or Cruz could leave a residue of bitterness that could undermine the party’s chances in November.
David IgnatiusHow can the GOP escape this demolition derby? Some have proposed a unity bid by House Speaker Paul Ryan, or the redux of Mitt Romney. But Ryan issued a statement Tuesday disavowing any interest.
Enter the candidates on horseback: It may sound like a crazy idea, but this country is hungry for the leadership the U.S. military, at its best, embodies.
Who should be on the roster of potential national-security draftees? Gen. James Mattis, a retired Marine who served as U.S. Central Command commander, has already been floated.
Mattis is a blunt, plainspoken man who could rival Trump for impolitic comments. Four-star officers sometimes describe him as the “warrior monk” because of his intense, ascetic manner. But he’s a true leader, beloved by his troops.
The GOP should consider some other names, if it’s looking for a former military leader who could unite a divided party and nation. A roll call, in alphabetical order:
* Gen. Stanley McChrystal commanded U.S. forces in Afghanistan and, before that, ran the deadly strike force known as the Joint Special Operations Command.
McChrystal might be controversial because he was sacked as commander in Afghanistan after a 2010 Rolling Stone article quoted him criticizing Vice President Joe Biden; critics argued that those remarks were unprofessional, but they probably wouldn’t bother grass-roots Republicans.
* Adm. Mike Mullen, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, led the military into a new era of tolerance toward gay men and lesbians. That might not endear him to Republicans, but officers who served with Mullen say he had a rare ability to unite the military and represent it to the country.
* Gen. David Petraeus, commander of U.S. troops in Iraq, Afghanistan and at Centcom, is probably the most decorated officer of his generation. Leading the surge of U.S. troops in Iraq in 2007, he managed to reverse the sectarian bloodbath there and briefly stabilize the country, in one of the few bright moments for the United States in Iraq.
Petraeus stumbled as CIA director when he shared classified information with a West Point graduate who had written his biography and with whom he was having an affair; he pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge.
* A final name would be former Rep. Mike Rogers, who retired in 2014 after heading the House Intelligence Committee. Rogers served only three years in the Army, but he makes the list because of his service as an FBI agent from 1988 to 1994 fighting organized crime in Chicago. Rogers also has a rare talent, among conservative Republicans, of working effectively with Democrats.
I tried to contact Mattis, McChrystal, Mullen, Petraeus and Rogers. But all of them either couldn’t be reached or declined comment. One virtue or liability of these names, depending on your perspective, is that except for Rogers, I’m not sure of their party affiliation.
The GOP may continue on its fun house ride with Trump and Cruz, but it is increasingly likely that this journey won’t have a happy ending. Maybe it is time for Republicans to consider a nominee who might actually be able to lead the country out of the wilderness.
Washington Post Writers Group