Skip to main content
Sunday, November 15, 2026Nov 15

Supreme Court to review NC’s use of race in redistricting

FILE - In a Tuesday, June 7, 2016 file photo, U.S. Rep. George Holding, R-N.C., makes remarks to supporters as his wife Lucy, left, applauds his victory at an event following the Republican Primary for the 2nd Congressional District in Raleigh, N.C. Holden defeated Rep. Renee Ellmers in the Primary.  The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday, June 27, 2016, to decide whether Republican lawmakers in North Carolina relied too heavily on race when they redrew the state's congressional districts in ways that gave the GOP a powerful advantage in the swing state.(AP Photo/Gerry Broome, File)
FILE - In a Tuesday, June 7, 2016 file photo, U.S. Rep. George Holding, R-N.C., makes remarks to supporters as his wife Lucy, left, applauds his victory at an event following the Republican Primary for the 2nd Congressional District in Raleigh, N.C. Holden defeated Rep. Renee Ellmers in the Primary. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday, June 27, 2016, to decide whether Republican lawmakers in North Carolina relied too heavily on race when they redrew the state's congressional districts in ways that gave the GOP a powerful advantage in the swing state.(AP Photo/Gerry Broome, File)

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) – The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to decide whether Republican lawmakers relied too heavily on race when they redrew North Carolina’s congressional districts to give the GOP a powerful advantage in the swing state.

The justices added the case to their fall calendar – almost certainly too late to affect 2016’s remaining races. But in the years ahead, it could impact partisan efforts to create electoral districts aimed at swaying the balance of power in Congress and in state legislatures.

It could be heard in conjunction with a separate case challenging voting districts in Virginia, an election law expert said.

North Carolina’s GOP leaders deny factoring in race to an illegal extent, saying their 2011 map was designed primarily to give Republicans an edge and to comply with the federal Voting Rights Act.

Opponents argue that they unfairly stacked minorities into fewer districts after the 2010 Census in ways that diluted their influence.