Skip to main content
Thursday, November 12, 2026Nov 12

Appeals court to hear oral arguments in ‘Deflategate’ case

FILE - In this Monday, Aug. 31, 2015, file photo, New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady leaves federal court, in New York. Lawyers who want Brady to put “Deflategate” behind him for good are ready to make their pitch to a New York appeals court. NFL lawyers are asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan on Thursday, March 3, 2016, to reinstate Brady’s four-game suspension. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)
FILE - In this Monday, Aug. 31, 2015, file photo, New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady leaves federal court, in New York. Lawyers who want Brady to put “Deflategate” behind him for good are ready to make their pitch to a New York appeals court. NFL lawyers are asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan on Thursday, March 3, 2016, to reinstate Brady’s four-game suspension. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File) FILE - In this Monday, Aug. 31, 2015, file photo, New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady leaves federal court, in New York. Lawyers who want Brady to put “Deflategate” behind him for good are ready to make their pitch to a New York appeals court. NFL lawyers are asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan on Thursday, March 3, 2016, to reinstate Brady’s four-game suspension. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)

NEW YORK (AP) – NFL union lawyers who want New England quarterback Tom Brady to put “Deflategate” behind him for good are ready to make their pitch to three federal appeals judges in New York.

NFL lawyers are asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan on Thursday to reinstate a four-game suspension the league handed Brady. They said a lower court was wrong to rule in September that the penalty could be lifted because the league bungled a probe of deflated footballs at the AFC Championship game in January 2015.

If the league wins, Brady may have to sit out the start of the upcoming season. If the union wins, it is likely he will play. Either way, the case is likely to be cited in labor law for years to come.

A ruling, unlikely for months, may hinge on obscure points of contract law that sports fans may find less interesting than the drama that has unfolded within the controversy.

In court papers, NFL attorneys have called U.S. District Judge Richard Berman’s decision “inexplicable.”