Skip to main content
Friday, October 30, 2026Oct 30

This story is free to read.

Long-resistant county near Atlanta votes down transit plan

FILE - In this Dec. 15, 2010 file photo, passengers leave an Eastbound MARTA train at the Five Points MARTA Station in downtown Atlanta. A contract with Atlanta's public transportation provider that would have brought a significant expansion of mass transit has been voted down by a north-metro county. Gwinnett County's referendum Tuesday, March 19, 2019, asked if voters wanted to authorize a contract with MARTA and impose a 1 percent sales tax for transit expansion. (Jason Getz/Atlanta Journal-Constitution via AP, File)
FILE - In this Dec. 15, 2010 file photo, passengers leave an Eastbound MARTA train at the Five Points MARTA Station in downtown Atlanta. A contract with Atlanta's public transportation provider that would have brought a significant expansion of mass transit has been voted down by a north-metro county. Gwinnett County's referendum Tuesday, March 19, 2019, asked if voters wanted to authorize a contract with MARTA and impose a 1 percent sales tax for transit expansion. (Jason Getz/Atlanta Journal-Constitution via AP, File) FILE - In this Dec. 15, 2010 file photo, passengers leave an Eastbound MARTA train at the Five Points MARTA Station in downtown Atlanta. A contract with Atlanta's public transportation provider that would have brought a significant expansion of mass transit has been voted down by a north-metro county. Gwinnett County's referendum Tuesday, March 19, 2019, asked if voters wanted to authorize a contract with MARTA and impose a 1 percent sales tax for transit expansion. (Jason Getz/Atlanta Journal-Constitution via AP, File)

ATLANTA (AP) – A contract with Atlanta’s public transportation provider that would have brought a significant expansion of mass transit was voted down by a long resistant Georgia county on Tuesday.

Gwinnett County’s referendum asked voters if they wanted to authorize a contract with MARTA and impose a 1 percent sales tax for transit expansion projects in the county just north of the city.

Unofficial results from the county’s board of elections show that just over 54 percent of the nearly 92,000 votes cast opposed the measure.

Advocates said approval would have helped alleviate the area’s notorious traffic problems and air pollution from cars idling in rush-hour gridlock.

Some critics opposed the idea of a countywide tax for a transit system only some residents would use.