Skip to main content
Thursday, October 29, 2026Oct 29

This story is free to read.

Time to end the recall

The appeal by 10 local business and community leaders seeking an end to the effort to recall Mayor Ron Littlefield, printed in this newspaper yesterday, makes a cogent argument for finally dropping the recall initiative altogether. Their letter argues, accurately, that the recall initiative harms the city’s image at both a national and international level, undermining our economic progress at a critical time. It causes uncertainty. And it distracts the city’s leadership and focus from more critical needs, while imposing needless court cost on taxpayers.

These are all good reasons to drop the recall. Indeed, it was an irrational and sparsely supported fringe effort over necessary fiscal policies that never should have been grounds for a recall to begin with.

Beyond that, however, there are compelling legal issues which demand dismissal of the recall move. We are hopeful that will occur next week after a second hearing in Circuit Court before Judge Jeff Hollingsworth.

Judge Hollingsworth previously ruled, in September, 2010, that the recall petitions — there are actually three different ones — were fatally flawed in several respects under prevailing state law. His ruling, unfortunately, was recently set aside by an appeals court on the basis that it was issued prematurely; that is, before the Hamilton County Election Commission had officially acted to accept the petitions and certify a recall of the mayor.

The appeals court, however, mysteriously failed to take into account the trial court evidence that the Election Commission, admittedly and wrongly, had already been accepting copies of the petitions despite the petitioners’ failure to comply with the state’s uniform legal standards for recall petitions. These standards demand specific questions on certified petitions, and they demand that voter signatures be verified against the roles of registered voters, and dated by the signers. Election commission officials blithely, wrongly, waived compliance with those rules. And they have never explained why, or been held to account for their laxity.