I’m angry.
I have been defending the Electoral College and the larger Madisonian vision behind it – often called “federalism” – for decades. This put me in the awkward position of defending the legitimacy of Donald Trump’s presidency – he lost the popular vote in 2016 but won in the Electoral College – while simultaneously arguing he was unfit for the job to which he was legitimately elected.
Before I get to why I’m angry, let me explain something. Under the Constitution, the citizenry doesn’t elect the president; the states do. They do this by appointing electors who vote in the Electoral College. How states allocate their electoral votes is left up to their legislatures.
(READ MORE: Supreme Court rejects Republican attack on Biden victory)
Since the Civil War, all states have decided to allot their electors to whichever candidate wins a majority of the vote within that state. But the legislatures don’t have to do it this way. Indeed, before the Civil War, South Carolina didn’t have a statewide vote for president. The legislature decided which candidate the state’s electors should vote for.
