Skip to main content
Friday, November 13, 2026Nov 13

Two justices once open to cameras in court now reconsider

United States Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor addresses a joint meeting of the Forum Club and Palm Beach Bar Association, Monday, Feb. 2, 2015 at the Palm Beach County Convention Center. (AP Photo/The Palm Beach Post, Damon Higgins)
United States Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor addresses a joint meeting of the Forum Club and Palm Beach Bar Association, Monday, Feb. 2, 2015 at the Palm Beach County Convention Center. (AP Photo/The Palm Beach Post, Damon Higgins) United States Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor addresses a joint meeting of the Forum Club and Palm Beach Bar Association, Monday, Feb. 2, 2015 at the Palm Beach County Convention Center. (AP Photo/The Palm Beach Post, Damon Higgins)

Two Supreme Court justices who once seemed open to the idea of cameras in the courtroom said Monday they have reconsidered those views, dashing even faint hopes that April’s historic arguments over gay marriage might be televised.

In separate appearances, Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor said allowing cameras might lead to grandstanding that could fundamentally change the nature of the high court.

Sotomayor told an audience in West Palm Beach, Florida, that cameras could change the behavior of both the justices and lawyers appearing at the court, who might succumb to “this temptation to use it as a stage rather than a courtroom.”

“I am moving more closely to saying I think it might be a bad idea,” she said.

During her confirmation hearings in 2009, Sotomayor told lawmakers she had a positive experience with cameras and would try to soften other justices’ opposition to cameras.