Skip to main content
Monday, November 2, 2026Nov 2

This story is free to read.

Reports: Billionaire Peter Thiel funding Hulk Hogan suit

FILE - In this Monday, March 21, 2016, file photo, Hulk Hogan, whose given name is Terry Bollea, left, looks on in court moments after a jury returned its decision in St. Petersburg, Fla. Billionaire tech investor Peter Thiel has been secretly funding Hulk Hogan’s lawsuit against Gawker Media for publishing a sex tape, according to reports in Forbes and The New York Times. (Dirk Shadd/The Tampa Bay Times via AP, Pool, File)
FILE - In this Monday, March 21, 2016, file photo, Hulk Hogan, whose given name is Terry Bollea, left, looks on in court moments after a jury returned its decision in St. Petersburg, Fla. Billionaire tech investor Peter Thiel has been secretly funding Hulk Hogan’s lawsuit against Gawker Media for publishing a sex tape, according to reports in Forbes and The New York Times. (Dirk Shadd/The Tampa Bay Times via AP, Pool, File) FILE - In this Monday, March 21, 2016, file photo, Hulk Hogan, whose given name is Terry Bollea, left, looks on in court moments after a jury returned its decision in St. Petersburg, Fla. Billionaire tech investor Peter Thiel has been secretly funding Hulk Hogan’s lawsuit against Gawker Media for publishing a sex tape, according to reports in Forbes and The New York Times. (Dirk Shadd/The Tampa Bay Times via AP, Pool, File)

NEW YORK (AP) – Billionaire tech investor Peter Thiel has been secretly funding Hulk Hogan’s lawsuit against Gawker Media for publishing a sex tape, according to reports in Forbes and The New York Times.

Forbes says Thiel, who co-founded PayPal and sits on the Facebook board of directors, has been footing the former wrestler’s legal bills “against a shared enemy.” The Forbes article , and a similar one in the Times, cited unnamed people familiar with the situation.

Efforts to reach Thiel on Tuesday morning were unsuccessful. Gawker said in a statement that it hopes an appellate court will “correct” a Florida jury’s $140 million verdict against the company and “reaffirm the law that protects a free and critical press.”