Skip to main content
Tuesday, November 10, 2026Nov 10

Latest Sandusky appeals hearing focuses on victim memories

FILE - In this Oct. 29, 2015, file photo, former Penn State University assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky arrives for an appeal hearing at the Centre County Courthouse in Bellefonte, Pa. A judge heard more testimony Thursday, May 11, 2017, in Sandusky's appeal of his 45-count conviction for child sexual abuse, as Sandusky argues his former defense lawyers didn't properly represent him in the 2012 trial. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File)
FILE - In this Oct. 29, 2015, file photo, former Penn State University assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky arrives for an appeal hearing at the Centre County Courthouse in Bellefonte, Pa. A judge heard more testimony Thursday, May 11, 2017, in Sandusky's appeal of his 45-count conviction for child sexual abuse, as Sandusky argues his former defense lawyers didn't properly represent him in the 2012 trial. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File) FILE - In this Oct. 29, 2015, file photo, former Penn State University assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky arrives for an appeal hearing at the Centre County Courthouse in Bellefonte, Pa. A judge heard more testimony Thursday, May 11, 2017, in Sandusky's appeal of his 45-count conviction for child sexual abuse, as Sandusky argues his former defense lawyers didn't properly represent him in the 2012 trial. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File)

BELLEFONTE, Pa. (AP) – A victim of Jerry Sandusky, one of his former defense lawyers and a psychology professor testified Thursday as the former Penn State assistant football coach sought a new trial in his child sexual abuse case.

Sandusky, 73, argued his former defense lawyers did not properly represent him, and he wants a do-over of the 2012 trial that produced a 45-count conviction.

The young man identified as Victim 7, who testified against Sandusky five years ago, said his statements evolved because at first he “wasn’t willing to go there,” Pennlive.com (http://bit.ly/2q9KS5R ) reported.

He said that changed, in part, because of counseling and therapy.

University of California, Irvine professor Elizabeth Loftus told the judge by phone that there is no credible scientific support for a theory that someone can wall off a “horrific brutalization” and then recall it later because of counseling and therapy.