Skip to main content
Thursday, October 29, 2026Oct 29

This story is free to read.

Thiessen: Impeaching Trump will only help him

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, shown here speaking during the We the People Membership Summit featuring the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates, was the first candidate to call for impeaching President Donald Trump. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, shown here speaking during the We the People Membership Summit featuring the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates, was the first candidate to call for impeaching President Donald Trump. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana) Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, shown here speaking during the We the People Membership Summit featuring the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates, was the first candidate to call for impeaching President Donald Trump. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

WASHINGTON – President Trump has called the Mueller investigation a “witch hunt” nearly two hundred times on social media alone. Well, the special counsel concluded he was not a witch. After carefully scrutinizing any links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign, Robert Mueller definitively declared “the investigation did not establish that the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.” He didn’t do it.

Still, several leading Democrats have called for Trump’s impeachment on obstruction-of-justice charges. This is absurd.

The lesson of Watergate, we are told, is that the coverup is always worse than the crime. But in Watergate, there was a crime to cover up. We now know that Trump committed no crime. There was nothing to cover up. As Mueller put it, “unlike cases in which a subject engages in obstruction of justice to cover up a crime, the evidence we obtained did not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference.”

This lack of an “underlying crime” is the source of Trump’s justified outrage over the Mueller investigation. Imagine that you were accused of a crime you knew you did not commit, and a special counsel was appointed who spent nearly two years and more than $25 million investigating you. You’d be angry and frustrated. You’d want someone to stand up for you, defend your interests and stop the insanity.

For two years, Trump watched as the investigation dragged on, weighing down his presidency. He had to endure being accused of “treason” and crimes of “a size and scope probably beyond Watergate.” He listened as members of the House and Senate intelligence committees, and former intelligence officials, led Americans to believe that they had seen secret evidence showing he had colluded with Russia – evidence he knew did not exist.