Skip to main content
Saturday, November 14, 2026Nov 14

New York governor raps Amazon critics amid report company’s rethinking

FILE - In this Tuesday, Jan. 29, 2019 file photo, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo meets with gun safety advocates in the Red Room during a news conference at the state Capitol in Albany, N.Y. Cuomo is shrugging off criticism from Roman Catholic leaders over his support of a new state abortion law. Speaking on public radio Tuesday, Cuomo said he is duty bound to separate his religious views from his work as governor.(AP Photo/Hans Pennink, File)
FILE - In this Tuesday, Jan. 29, 2019 file photo, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo meets with gun safety advocates in the Red Room during a news conference at the state Capitol in Albany, N.Y. Cuomo is shrugging off criticism from Roman Catholic leaders over his support of a new state abortion law. Speaking on public radio Tuesday, Cuomo said he is duty bound to separate his religious views from his work as governor.(AP Photo/Hans Pennink, File)

Gov. Andrew Cuomo warned Friday that what he calls “political pandering” to critics of Amazon’s proposed secondary headquarters could sink New York’s biggest-ever economic development deal. But opponents say they’ll keep fighting about a project they consider corporate welfare.

The back-and-forth came after The Washington Post reported that Amazon is reconsidering its planned New York City headquarters because of some local politicians’ opposition to the nearly $3 billion incentive package. The report cited two unnamed people familiar with the company’s thinking.

In response, Amazon would say only that it’s engaging with small business owners, community leaders and educators, pointing to its pledges to fund high school computer science classes and contribute to job training.

“We are working hard to demonstrate what kind of neighbor we will be,” the Seattle-based company said in a statement.

Noting the report, Cuomo accused the state Senate – whose leader recently tapped an Amazon critic for a board that might have sway over the project’s subsidies – of “governmental malpractice” and siding with those who are “pandering to the local politics.”