Skip to main content
Friday, November 13, 2026Nov 13

Opinion: Trump’s right that abortion is trouble for the Republican Party

File photo/Nick Hagen/The New York Times / Former President Donald Trump, the Republican candidate for president, seen here at a campaign event in Howell, Mich., on Aug. 20, 2024, said on Aug. 29, 2024, that he would require insurance companies or the federal government to pay for all costs associated with in vitro fertilization treatments if he is elected in November, further trying to rebrand himself to voters on an issue that has cost Republicans at the ballot box: reproductive access.
File photo/Nick Hagen/The New York Times / Former President Donald Trump, the Republican candidate for president, seen here at a campaign event in Howell, Mich., on Aug. 20, 2024, said on Aug. 29, 2024, that he would require insurance companies or the federal government to pay for all costs associated with in vitro fertilization treatments if he is elected in November, further trying to rebrand himself to voters on an issue that has cost Republicans at the ballot box: reproductive access. File photo/Nick Hagen/The New York Times / Former President Donald Trump, the Republican candidate for president, seen here at a campaign event in Howell, Mich., on Aug. 20, 2024, said on Aug. 29, 2024, that he would require insurance companies or the federal government to pay for all costs associated with in vitro fertilization treatments if he is elected in November, further trying to rebrand himself to voters on an issue that has cost Republicans at the ballot box: reproductive access.

When the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and a half-century of settled abortion rights two years ago, Donald Trump said it would be bad for Republicans. He obviously meant himself, as last week he clumsily offered a few different stands on abortion as he tries to find his footing, confounding his supporters.

The radical court decision was the result of three justices Trump put on the court, and now he’s scrambling two months before Election Day.

During an interview with NBC News on Thursday he said a second Trump administration would either directly provide or force insurers to provide in-vitro fertilization treatments for anyone who needed them.

So what then, the federal government is going to provide or mandate coverage for IVF treatments, and then keep the resulting tens or hundreds of thousands of frozen embryos? For how long, indefinitely? And who exactly is going to allocate the enormous resources that are going to be necessary?

Congress likely wouldn’t be all too keen, and it’s dubious that Trump could reasonably pull off another fiscal sleight of hand like he did appropriating military funds towards a border wall. Experts actually well-versed in the matter have already said it’s a logistically tall order to accomplish.