Skip to main content
Thursday, November 5, 2026Nov 5

This story is exclusive to subscribers.

Times Opinion: Hamilton County’s vendetta against Red Bank

Staff file photo / Hamilton County Property Assessor Marty Haynes speaks to Red Bank city officials Oct. 14, 2025, to discuss an error in the city's certified tax rate found after tax bills had been mailed out.
Staff file photo / Hamilton County Property Assessor Marty Haynes speaks to Red Bank city officials Oct. 14, 2025, to discuss an error in the city's certified tax rate found after tax bills had been mailed out. Staff file photo / Hamilton County Property Assessor Marty Haynes speaks to Red Bank city officials Oct. 14, 2025, to discuss an error in the city's certified tax rate found after tax bills had been mailed out.

In theory, Hamilton County government is supposed to represent all of its municipalities, but one in particular is treated as second-class: Red Bank.

As is routine every four years in Tennessee, Marty Haynes, the county’s property assessor, set a new property tax rate for each city within Hamilton County.

An accurate calculation is vital in maintaining city revenue — and in turn, essential public services.

Unfortunately, Haynes made a grave mistake. Per state law, when property values are reassessed every four years, the property tax rate must be set to a level in which the local government imposing the taxes does not receive additional revenue from increased values.

Therefore, the rate in Red Bank was lowered to counter a historic rise in home values. But instead of setting the rate based on 2024 values — as he should have — Haynes cited assessments from 2021.