Skip to main content
Wednesday, November 11, 2026Nov 11

Attorney: Army officer recommends no jail time for Bergdahl

FILE - This undated file image provided by the U.S. Army shows Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl. An Army officer is recommending that Bergdahl face a lower-level court martial and be spared the possibility of jail time for leaving his post in Afghanistan, his lawyer said Saturday, Oct. 10, 2015. (U.S. Army via AP, file)
FILE - This undated file image provided by the U.S. Army shows Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl. An Army officer is recommending that Bergdahl face a lower-level court martial and be spared the possibility of jail time for leaving his post in Afghanistan, his lawyer said Saturday, Oct. 10, 2015. (U.S. Army via AP, file) FILE - This undated file image provided by the U.S. Army shows Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl. An Army officer is recommending that Bergdahl face a lower-level court martial and be spared the possibility of jail time for leaving his post in Afghanistan, his lawyer said Saturday, Oct. 10, 2015. (U.S. Army via AP, file)

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) – An Army officer is recommending that Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl face a lower-level court martial and be spared the possibility of jail time for leaving his post in Afghanistan, his lawyer said Saturday.

Defense attorney Eugene Fidell said Lt. Col. Mark Visger has decided Bergdahl’s case should go to a military system similar to civilian courts that handle misdemeanor charges. It limits the maximum punishment to reduction of rank, a bad conduct discharge and a short jail term, though that isn’t being sought, Fidell said.

Military prosecutors charged Bergdahl in March with desertion and misbehavior before the enemy, a charge that could carry a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.

Bergdahl was captured by the Taliban after leaving his post on June 30, 2009, and held until last year, when he was exchanged for five Taliban commanders. His commanding officers in Afghanistan say a 45-day search for Bergdahl put soldiers in danger.

The Obama administration’s prisoner swap was sharply criticized by many Republicans and some Democrats, who said it was politically motivated and counter to the U.S. policy against negotiating with terrorists.