Skip to main content
Thursday, October 29, 2026Oct 29

This story is free to read.

Opinion: The Constitution outranks all: Trump’s executive order revoking birthright citizenship is meaningless

Photo/Lindsey Wasson/The Associated Press / Washington Attorney General Nick Brown speaks during a news conference announcing that Washington will join a federal lawsuit to challenge President Donald Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship on Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2025, in Seattle.
Photo/Lindsey Wasson/The Associated Press / Washington Attorney General Nick Brown speaks during a news conference announcing that Washington will join a federal lawsuit to challenge President Donald Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship on Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2025, in Seattle. Photo/Lindsey Wasson/The Associated Press / Washington Attorney General Nick Brown speaks during a news conference announcing that Washington will join a federal lawsuit to challenge President Donald Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship on Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2025, in Seattle.

Donald Trump on Monday took an oath to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” and then promptly broke that oath by seeking to revoke the first sentence of the 14th Amendment: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

Remember, Trump has not been elected king or strongman, and indeed a balance of powers was the foundational idea on which the U.S. constitutional system was designed. Trump and his burgeoning administration can talk all they’d like about a popular mandate about carrying the will of the people, responding decisively to crisis and so on, but it is not just an option but a fundamental responsibility for the Congress and the federal courts to push back as necessary.

In 1898, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Wong Kim Ark v. United States that all people born on American territory, barring the extremely narrow exception of the parents being foreign diplomats, are citizens by birth under the 14th Amendment.

Trump knows very well that an executive order cannot overturn Supreme Court precedent, nor can it unilaterally reinterpret or do away with parts of the Constitution (we’d imagine Joe Biden would have simply undone the overturn of Roe’s abortion protections with the stroke of a pen otherwise).

Just because the president orders something, and tries to use the levers of the federal government to implement it, doesn’t mean he has the authority. The picture has gotten muddier since Trump’s Supreme Court majority gave him unqualified immunity from criminal prosecution for so-called official acts after he leaves office, but he’s still just one person.