published Saturday, December 31st, 2011

Obama wooing veterans in campaign


Associated Press

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama ended one war and is winding down another, bringing home tens of thousands of U.S. troops. Now he wants them to pay him back — with votes.

“You stood up for America. America needs to stand up for you,” Obama told service members returning to Fort Bragg, N.C. from Iraq recently.

Expect to hear that pitch throughout the next year as the president’s campaign, mindful that large numbers of veterans and military families live in states crucial to his re-election chances, highlights his efforts to promote jobs and benefits for veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. Republicans, meanwhile, already are countering his record, noting high unemployment among veterans.

The outreach to veterans is part of a larger effort by Obama to build inroads with voting blocs traditionally outside the Democratic umbrella while it tries to reactivate the coalition of women, minorities and young voters who helped propel him to the White House in 2008. Obama’s campaign is free to focus on building a diverse base of support for the general election because he faces no primary opponent. His eventual GOP challenger doesn’t have that luxury.

While Democrats have traditionally trailed Republicans on defense and national security matters, Obama senses an opening with veterans because he has generally received high marks from voters for his handling of terrorism — especially after the U.S. raid in May that killed Osama bin Laden — and in managing the U.S.’s relationships with other countries. A recent AP-GfK poll found that 59 percent of adults felt Obama would keep America safe, a mark that has remained steady throughout 2011.

Exit polls in 2008 showed that Obama received about 44 percent of voters who said they served in the military, while 54 percent voted for Republican John McCain, a former Navy pilot who was a prisoner of war for more than five years during the Vietnam War. Four years earlier, George W. Bush, who sought re-election as the U.S. waged wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, won 57 percent of voters who said they served in the military, compared with 41 percent for Democrat John Kerry.

There are obvious political reasons for Obama’s effort.

Several states that will be heavily contested next year have a significant military presence. Florida, home to a number of military installations, has more than 1.6 million veterans, according to the Veterans Administration. Virginia and North Carolina, political battlegrounds that Obama carried in 2008, both have about 800,000 veterans while Colorado, another important state in the Obama re-election calculation, has more than 400,000 veterans.

This year, the playing field in the fight to woo veterans may end up being level if anyone other than Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Texas Rep. Ron Paul — the only two with military experience in the GOP field — win the nomination. Obama had no military experience before becoming commander in chief. (The last time both parties didn’t have a presidential candidate with military experience was 1944, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt defeated Thomas E. Dewey.)

As the nation winds down wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Obama and first lady Michelle Obama have held numerous events at military bases and in communities heavily populated by veterans. During a bus tour through North Carolina and Virginia in October, the president and first lady stopped at Joint Base Langley-Eustis in the heart of a large military community in Hampton and Newport News, Va. Since entering the White House, the first lady has held about 50 events with military families in 14 states.

Obama also has talked up his work on a new GI Bill helping veterans and service members to attend college and on tax incentives for companies that hire veterans, a piece of his jobs bill that won passage in Congress during the fall. The Democratic National Committee featured the incentives in ads that aired in North Carolina, New Mexico and Ohio.

Bob Wallace, executive director of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, said Obama has been “very positive” for veterans. He said members of his organization are looking for specific ways the next White House administration — Democrat or Republican — intends to help veterans.

“The cost of war continues after the last shot is fired and after you pull the trucks over the border into Kuwait,” Wallace said. “You’ve got a lot of expenses to take care of these guys and gals and that’s the commitment we’re looking for anybody who wants to be president of the United States.”

Republicans challenge Obama’s record on veterans’ issues by pointing to high jobless rates among those returning from military service — more than 11 percent for veterans who have served since the Sept. 11, 2011, attacks are unemployed. Republican presidential candidates also have raised concerns about defense spending and the move by Obama to withdraw troops from Iraq and Afghanistan.

Scott Rutter, a retired Army lieutenant colonel from New City, N.Y., who serves as a veterans policy adviser to former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney’s campaign, said many veterans are concerned about their job prospects after leaving the military along with a disability claims backlog that can leave a veteran waiting months or even years to get a claim processed.

“We need leadership. You’ve got to put a little do-ah in the hooah,” Rutter said. “You can talk about it but you have to have results.”

Surrounding Obama’s trip to Fort Bragg, Romney wrote in an op-ed in The Fayetteville Observer that “words of welcome to our returning soldiers are not enough,” calling it “a disgrace that those who are now returning from Iraq join other Iraq veterans suffering from unemployment above 11 percent.” And in an October speech at The Citadel, South Carolina’s military college, Romney vowed to increase defense spending and increase the number of Navy ships.

Perry, running behind in early voting states, has increasingly drawn attention to his military credentials, running ads featuring decorated veterans touting his leadership abilities. He has criticized Obama for troop withdrawals from Iraq and Afghanistan. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, meanwhile, has opposed defense cuts except for waste.

Paul, who served as an Air Force physician during the Vietnam era, has opposed efforts to require military retirees to pay more for health care coverage. Both parties have discussed cost-cutting changes to the military’s health care program to help deal with large deficits.

about Associated Press...

The Associated Press

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
rolando said...

Why's he bother; he won't let their votes be counted anyway...

Does make campaign fodder for the media, though...

December 31, 2011 at 3:16 p.m.
terrybham said...

All this pro-Veteran talk coming from Mitt Romney is interesting, especially when you remember that he was on a religious mission during the worst of that war. In 1968 I was in an Infantry company in Viet Nam where I was severely wounded while at the same time Mitt was sightseeing in Paris. In light of this fact I suppose this would make him a splendid leader and an inspiration to all. His past history should show us that we can depend on him when the going gets tough.

December 31, 2011 at 3:17 p.m.
patriot1 said...

Obama promoting jobs and benefits for veterans? that's so funny!!!..he is cutting benefits....he increased tricare premiums this year. Copay is up.....

December 31, 2011 at 5:22 p.m.
Lr103 said...

rolando, it was the republicans and right wing conservative who disrespected the veterans during the Bush administration. During the initial invasion of Iraq, when military servicemen and women complained about poorly operating and dangerous equipment, the likes of Rush Limbaugh told them to stop whining because "they volunteered didn't they?" His words. Rumsfeld threatened to court martial military servicement and women who openly complained to the media about faulty, non-functioning and dangerous equipment and condtions. Bush usually just sat there with this blank look on his face as if he had no idea whatsoever what was going on.

December 31, 2011 at 10:20 p.m.
wyldmon said...

All Presidents woo Veterans. All have been guilty of not doing more for them. Again, not news.

January 1, 2012 at 7:12 a.m.
retiredvet said...

@patriot1, you are WRONG. The Republicans are the ones cutting my benifits as a retired vet. The Republicans are trying to pass a bill which will triple my Tricare cost and they want to reduce our 20 year retirement to 38%. Please get your facts straight. It's all in that effort to break the working class folks, the Republican agenda.

January 1, 2012 at 8:47 a.m.
retiredvet said...

GOP Looks at Cutting Veterans Health Benefits for 2011-12 Session to Fulfill Pledge

January 1, 2012 at 9:16 a.m.
prairie_dog said...

LR103, I happen to work for one of the DoD activities responsible for repairing and maintaining ground combat equipment. FYI, the reason our equipment was in such lousy shape on 9/11/2001 was directly because of cuts made by the Clinton administration. There were billions of dollars worth of inoperative and sub-standard equipment sitting around needing repair when GW took over. Put the blame on the Democratic administration and legislators which caused the situation. It takes more than a year to rotate even a small part of heavy ground combat equipment through depot maintenance, and the Clinton Administration's neglect for readiness is the cause of the conditions you describe.

January 1, 2012 at 3:01 p.m.
prairie_dog said...

retiredvet, yes you are right. The GOP has betrayed us too. I saw the writing on the wall in the mid '80s and resigned with almost 12 years of service because I could see what was coming. Best decision I ever made.

January 1, 2012 at 3:04 p.m.
luckjoe said...

Obama has shot all of his arrows. Bail outs, Obamacare.. Now it's veterans and illegals. To him it is all about the vote.

January 1, 2012 at 8:13 p.m.

Damn, a politician doing things for people, in the hopes that it will get their support.

My word, what an unthinkable concept. Here I thought politicians were supposed to anger and inflame the people to hate them, and perform their jobs with the greatest deal of incompetence so as to show how bad a failure government was.

January 1, 2012 at 9:07 p.m.
BravesDave said...

You can always count on the Serpent-In-Chief to start slingin' the lies in an effort to get some of the votes he doesn't steal! If he is re-elected the America I love and treasure will be lost. Open your eyes Kool-Aid drinkers!

January 2, 2012 at 2:16 p.m.
BravesDave said...

Happy? He has most CERTAINLY performed his job with the "greatest deal of incompetence." WORST EVER.

January 2, 2012 at 2:18 p.m.
please login to post a comment

Other National Articles

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.