published Tuesday, May 24th, 2011

'Tennessee proves sales tax is better than income tax' and more letters to the editor

Use reputable firms, workmen

In the wake of the great tornadoes, I offer a cautionary tale. After the great storm blew through, I found a 60-foot tree embracing the back of my house. A door-to-door team came by shortly thereafter, and I accepted their offer to remove the tree.

For about an hour, one worker lopped off the bottom six branches of the tree, leaving the great trunk of the tree untouched. The owner then asked me for $500 cash, which I wisely declined to provide. He promised to be back the next day to continue work but did not reappear for a week.

In the meantime, I had engaged a reputable tree service from yellow pages who removed the whole tree in about an hour. Subsequent to this, the first tree service owner called and said he was filing for a lien against my property. He would settle for $1,500, and five of his “boys” would be around to “collect.” So a redundant threat: he would both sue me and knee-cap me.

It was bluster, of course, but if you wish to avoid this unpleasantness, stick with recognized tree service operators and decline anyone who asks for cash for an uncompleted job.

STEVEN SHRADER


Gun carry article contains errors

Your front-page article “Gun-carry confusion” (May 16) contained some errors about both the current state of Georgia’s gun (and knife) carry laws.

It is not new to our laws that openly carrying a pistol in plain view is legal. People have been allowed to do that going back to the early 1900s.

A “place of worship” is not a place where a private individual with a Georgia carry permit can bring a gun, even if the head of the church congregation gives permission. Management of a bar or nightclub can give such permission to carry in that kind of place, but the management of a church has no such discretion. The only exception about no guns in churches is found in O.C.G.A. 16-11-127 (d), which says you will not be violating this law if you immediately tell management or security at a gun-free location (not limited to churches) that you have a gun, and then you must follow their instructions regarding how to remove it, store it, or secure it.

I doubt that management at such a location has the authority to tell you to “secure” your firearm by carrying loaded on your body, ready for use, just as you had been all along.

KURT J. MARTIN

Jasper, Ga.


Pill explanation just nonsense

The county commissioners unanimously approved funding for the “morning after pill” on the grounds that it did not produce an abortion. This is mere word play.

“Because the fertilized egg was prevented from implantation in the uterus, therefore the woman was never pregnant. So there was no abortion.” Nonsense!

The end result was that a living human being was denied sustenance needed to continue to live.

There are women who go to great expense to have their eggs fertilized and frozen and later implanted in a womb, and which grow into much wanted children.

If you saw a child on the street dying of hunger, and you prevented those who would provide him/her food, couldn’t you be arrested and charged with murder?

If you see a living embryo, and prevent it from finding nourishment to continue to live, aren’t you likewise guilty?

I believe that the County Commission just unanimously authorized murder of the unborn and is charging us with the bill. Shame on them all!

DR. MARSHALL C.

ST. JOHN,

Pastor

Wayside Presbyterian Church

Signal Mountain


Tennessee proves sales tax is better

Recent Tennessee history proves that a sales tax outperforms an income tax in two respects. Wages for all income levels increase and tax burdens remain lower under a sales tax.

How was this conclusion reached? The ALEC-Laffer Index compared Tennessee to its northern neighbor. The two are similar from a historical perspective and are very similar in geographical make-up. In essence, Tennessee and Kentucky can draw from very similar economic resources.

In 1980, the per capita (per person) income of a Tennessee resident was about $16 higher than a Kentucky resident. However, by 1998, that number had increased to $2,064. The explanation for the difference is that Tennessee operates under a sales tax and Kentucky operates under an income tax.

By 1998, Tennesseans earned more money and paid 25 percent less dollar-for-dollar in taxes on that money. Tennesseans out-earned their northern neighbors and paid less in taxes because they have a sales tax.

The Fair Tax implemented at the national level will have equal benefits. Tennesseans have proven that the Fair Tax would be better than the broken system we have today. Chuck Fleischmann should join his fellow East Tennessee congressman, John Duncan, and become a co-sponsor to the Fair Tax.

AARON MULLIS

TODD WATSON

Cleveland, Tenn.


Politicians should look for solutions

When I read “Amazon is not a threat to existing businesses” (Rep. Gerald McCormick, May 15) methinks politician and imbecile (choose your word) are synonyms. The (state), he says, “... will not lose a single penny of sales tax it currently receives ...”. Amazon’s sales are growing almost 30 percent annually, and Tennessee residents are part of that growth, so the state is losing sales tax already, and will also lose gasoline tax and other taxes as we shop from home, reduce driving and reduce other purchases.

Politicians repeatedly say “small businesses create the jobs,” then provide taxpayer incentives so big business can kill more small businesses. (VW and Wacker are exceptions!)

Our economy grows because investments in technology continue to require more educated people to create more productive facilities, resulting in more lost jobs and people unable to find work (and pay taxes), requiring more welfare and social workers.

Solutions to our “social issues” will require effective birth control programs, resolution of immigration issues and an educational system for all children (with tax structure and rates to support it). When will politicians shed their cowardliness and really work as policy makers on these solutions, rather than continuously posturing on “social issues” to appease their donors?

MARVIN TURNER

Hixson

6
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
librul said...

Unlike Mr. St. John, I do not believe a fertilized egg, implanted or not, can in any way be described as a "human being". It's a fertilized egg, nothing more. Only a fetus which can survive outside the womb meets that test. Millions of fertilized eggs are flushed down toilets each year as a result of natural abortion. The near insanity surrounding fundamentalists' mania on the issue of abortion is ridiculous and their attemps at equating "human beings" with zygotes makes them appear willing to arbitrarily redefine most accepted pillars of scientific thought. An examination of the website for Wayside confirms that suspicion. And they even have a school where impressionable young human beings are sent to be inculcated with this hokum! In my opinion, it qualifies as intellectual child abuse. One can only hope the children can recover as they mature and become the open, inquisitive, skeptical minds that our country will need in the future.

May 24, 2011 at 1:39 a.m.
Livn4life said...

Librul, you just know everything there is about human life and just how ignorant everyone else is who does not take your perspective. The term Liberal means free and open. You are free and open only if something suits you. That is no different from the fundamentals you bely and ridicule. Oh yes, and you know all about the issues of life. Guess you read Wikipedia!

May 24, 2011 at 6:22 a.m.
librul said...

Blah, blah, blah Livn. That's all mashed potatoes - how about some steak. There's nothing "free and open" about a world defined within the confines of illogical dogma.

May 24, 2011 at 10:20 a.m.
Rickaroo said...

The argument that "Dr." St. John sets forth in his stance against the morning-after pill is so preposterous as to defy any semblance of logic. With critical thinking - or rather the lack of it - like he displays I'm wondering how he ever received his doctorate. Of course, to become a "doctor" as it pertains to any form of Christianity means that one's critical thinking skills are best dispensed with anyway.

Let me make sure I've got this right: he compares a woman's unfertilized egg to a child on the street dying of hunger and someone preventing someone else from providing him/her nourishment. Let me read that again to see if that really is as stupid as it sounds. Yep. That's pretty stupid.

How far do you self-righteous, fanatical Christian cretins want to carry this abortion thing anyway? You are so emotionally tangled up in it that you can't even see how moronic and nonsensical you have become. It's not enough that you want to interfere with a woman's reproductive rights in the first place. Now you want to go even further and deny her the right to a sane, practical, and innocuous means of birth control. What's more, you call it... murder?!

There is no point in trying to debate the issue with someone who lacks the ability to think logically and analytically in the first place. Wage your silly little delusional war and pray to your mean-spirited little God to bless you and act pious and holy in front of your Sunday flock... but you, sir, are nuts.

May 24, 2011 at 3:12 p.m.
Leaf said...

In response to "Pill explanation just nonsense," I'd just like to point out that it is impossible to prove an emotional point using logic. To illustrate, I will now use logic to prove my point.

Dr. Marshall says if a fertilized egg doesn't attach to the uterus it is denied sustenance and that's just like starving a child to death. I agree completely. In addition, blocking the fertilization of an egg is denying a potential life, so all forms of birth control should be illegal.

Of course, celibacy for a woman of child bearing years from puberty to menopause should also be illegal. Think of all the children she could bear in a lifetime - precious children that are currently denied life by our two-or-three-child modern society.

In addition, in order to further the quality of humanity, these children should only be fathered by the best men. I volunteer to be a fertilizer because my IQ is extremely high and I'm quite good-looking and great in bed. So send me your sisters, daughters and wives and I will fertilize them as often as possible. It's only logical.

May 24, 2011 at 4:18 p.m.
LibDem said...

"There are women who go to great expense to have their eggs fertilized and frozen and later implanted in a womb, and which grow into much wanted children." At least Dr. St. John concedes that the whole procreation business is just a mechanical process that doesn't require that mom, dad and the stork ever be in the same room. When he starts handing out free condoms, I'll believe that he sincerely wants to prevent abortions.

May 24, 2011 at 4:23 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.