published Friday, July 13th, 2012

Who benefits?

America's economy is plagued by high unemployment, family budgets pressed to stretch every dollar, declining wages and a longing for improvement that still seems very distant.

That is unless you work in the Barack Obama White House.

In the three years of President Obama's tenure, the payroll at the People's House has expanded by almost $5 million, to $37.8 million. In 2008, the last year of the Bush Administration, the pay for White House personnel cost totaled $33.1 million.

The 14.1% increase in salaries documented in the Report to Congress on White House Staff for personnel working at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue certainly does not reflect the American taxpayers' appetite for cutting spending and balancing budgets.

Much has been said, yet little done, to address the escalating wages in government compared to the private sector.

According to a report by the Congressional Budget Office, there were significant advantages to being on the federal payroll. "Federal civilian employees with no more than a high school education averaged 36% higher total compensation than similar private-sector employees. Federal workers whose education culminated in a bachelor's degree averaged 15% higher total compensation than their private-sector counterparts," the 28-page analysis concluded.

With bureaucrats raking in dollars much faster than workers in the private sector, when we ask our children, "What do you want to be when you grow up?," they may soon answer, "A government employee."

3
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.

Yes, because underpaid workers are the best!

But seriously, your facts are twisted as usual. Notice how you didn't even mention the number of employees.

http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/06/friday-night-news-dump-white-house-salaries-edition-127779.html

I'm surprised you didn't try to make the already discredited complaint about gender inequity in salaries.

http://nationaljournal.com/congress-legacy/how-congressional-republicans-and-democrats-pay-women-20120711

When are you going to write an editorial about that?

July 13, 2012 at 12:30 a.m.
EaTn said...

While I agree that we have too many govt folks making more than average, it's also sad that this right-wing legislation has wasted money and time repealing the much needed health care law 33 times while unemployment is drowning many families. They could have at least repealed the ethanol gas-additive requirement that has driven the price of food up, especially during this particularly bad drought season.

July 13, 2012 at 6:50 a.m.

Sorry EaTn, but farmers don't just plant fields just because, if they didn't think they could sell the food at a good price, they wouldn't plant them anyway. And farmers know very well that a race to the bottom is not a good thing. Well, I shouldn't say farmers, but rather the massive agricultural conglomerations that really produce most of the food.

Fortunately we're a long way from starving.

July 13, 2012 at 5 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.