published Friday, November 2nd, 2012

Struggles at the library

The Public Library here — perhaps still more familiarly known to most by its original name, the Chattanooga-Hamilton County Bicentennial Library — is in a state of flux. At a time when a broad segment of the community is in need of its services, politically-fueled budget issues and other concerns have forced it to effectively reduce its client base and to carefully husband meager resources rather than expand its outreach. Unfortunately, the library here is not unique. Many libraries across the country face similar and even worse problems.

Indeed, the contemporary library story across the United States is all too familiar and depressing. Some libraries have closed because communities either could not or would not fund them. In other places, libraries have sharply reduced operating hours, severely limited purchases of new material — including increasingly vital Internet services and electronic subscriptions — and consolidated branches. Strangely, many of these actions have taken place at a time when visits to the library, the circulation of books and demand for computers and related services provide continues to grow. That's happening here.

The picture is not entirely bleak. In some far-sighted communities where public officials and citizens understand that a dollar invested in a public library and the services it provides produce a significant and measurable return, libraries flourish. That should be the goal here.

Unfortunately, that's not been the case in recent years. The library — caught in a nasty flap between city and county governments — was forced to retrench a few years ago. The cuts were painful and a severe blow to a populace that rightly has come to know that a public library should be the area's greatest and most accessible source of knowledge and information.

Currently, operations of the Public Library are funded by the City of Chattanooga. Hamilton County government, which once contributed a fair share to the library's upkeep, no longer does. That's a short-sighted decision if there ever was one. The county's willful failure to provide funds for the library means, among other things, that county residents outside the city no longer have free access to many library services. That's harmful not only to those denied access to knowledge and services, but to the community's image.

In a place that is widely known for its inclusive and harmonious approach to a wide variety of issues, including the riverfront development and industrial recruitment effort that have given the city a new civic vitality and economic muscle, the county's adamant refusal to fund the library is strikingly out of tune.

The county has an obligation to fund a library for all its citizens — including the majority of county residents who live within the city's borders and pay county as well as city taxes. Indeed, a majority of the county's tax base comes from property and business owners in Chattanooga. The ratepayers within in city limits, however, get little in return for the county taxes they pay. Hamilton County officials hoard the money, and when they do spend it, the funds pay mostly for services limited to county residents who pay a far lower share of taxes to the county than city property owners.

The library seems to emerging from its worst days, but that's no excuse for the county to continue its neglect. Hours, to be sure, have been extended, facilities upgraded and some services restored. But it's not enough. The system here still operates on a truncated schedule that poses difficulties for many patrons, particularly those who don't have ready access to reference material or a computer at home. It also struggles to maintain a full and accessible collection of up-to-date books, data and electronic services that are the hallmark of the modern library.

Whatever the broader political issues surrounding shared expenses between governments here, surely county officials can remove their blinders long enough to see the importance and necessity of a library open to all residents of Hamilton County, and the county's responsibility for the funding to make that possible. The library is a singular issue that transcends petty political squabbles. A public library is a necessity. It should not be held hostage to political expediency and personal ego.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
dfclapp said...

According to the July 2012 library board minutes, the City has increased the budget for the library over the past few years to $6,239,688 ( from a little over $5.8 million in 2010, at the expense of other agencies. This increase came despite cutting services to County residents outside of Chattanooga and loss of one branch. If it is struggling, it is not because it is suddenly starved for cash. Many libraries have suffered cuts, not benefited from increases.

To take away the funding mechanism from the County and then blame the County for not supporting the library is rich. It is even more insulting to claim that the City would be doing its fair share for other county residents by expecting them to pay for inconvenient facilities, far away from their homes. To show how bogus this is, look at how the City disenfranchised newly annexed areas of Ooltewah simply because the City refused to include any facility that wasn't inside City limits. How is this situation likely to change, should the County pay half? The City resented the Ooltewah/Collegedale library from the day it was built in 1992, even though 90% of the budget went to City of Chattanooga buildings and the County was paying 50%.

November 3, 2012 at 5:58 a.m.
328Kwebsite said...

Thank you for acknowledging that the Chattanooga-Hamilton County Bicentennial Library is important to all of us.

It was the city, on the initiative of Mayor Ron Littlefield, who refused funding for the library when the city refused to renew a long standing tax agreement.

Trying to place the blame on the county is not only outright false, but also it's an insult to the intelligence of your readership. Who on the Free Press wrote this Times editorial?

Face facts: your patrons' favorite son, Ron Littlefield, has been the worst mayor ever. The entire city, and most of the county, will celebrate the end of his term in office. It's likely that the library staff will, too.

Get the facts right. Read your own articles. Notice the observable truth: it was the City of Chattanooga's Mayor, not the county, that destroyed funding for the library. We all saw who initiated that mess, who insisted on refusing the tax agreement, and who to this day will not fund important and essential services for the city and the county like the library.

Lying to cover it up for your patrons' ad dollars won't do you any good when we have all seen the facts.

We look forward to seeing a Times-Free Press editorial supporting the continuance of the city/county tax agreement as soon as possible.

November 3, 2012 at 7:20 a.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.