published Tuesday, September 4th, 2012

Capitol and capital problem

The United States has many symbols. There's the flag, of course, and cases can be made for the White House, the U.S. seal, the Washington monument, the American bald eagle and the Capitol dome. All have their following, but each deserves at least a bit of respect. Some get it. When the eagle, for example, was placed on the endangered species list, a broad-based effort to protect it and build its population proved successful. Other symbols, though, get less support. The roof of the Capitol -- the dome -- currently tops the list.

The dome, arguably the foremost symbol of the federal government, is in poor condition. It might look fine from afar, but close inspection shows that the exterior of the dome is riddled with cracks and breaks, about 1,300 according to architects and engineers. The exterior damage allows water to seep into the interior. As any homeowner who has dealt with a leaky roof knows, the result of such decay is lamentably predictable.

So it is with the dome. Officials report that at least 100 pieces of the dome already have been removed or have fallen off. Inside the dome, ornamentation is beginning to rust, stains are starting to appear and the fresco, frieze and other works of art there are endangered. There is understandable worry, too, that if major repairs aren't undertaken soon, public safety will be compromised. Timely repairs, then, would seem to be in order.

That seems unlikely. Symbol or not, funding for repairs to the dome have been caught up in the partisan political rancor that has makes congressional funding approval for any project an exercise in frustration. Repairing the roof of one of the most recognized buildings in the United States, and perhaps the world, would seem like the perfect project to overcome such gridlock. Nope.

The GOP-controlled House voted earlier this year to trim the Capitol maintenance budget, part of the Republican effort to reduce the federal deficit. The Senate did a bit better, but not much. The appropriations committee there voted to provide some funding, but there are no current plans that anyone knows about for the full Senate to vote on the appropriation. Meanwhile, the dome continues to leak and the damage to the building, its interior and national pride accrues.

Repairs, experts estimate, would cost at least $61 million, a lot of money but not so much that the nation can't afford to invest the amount in such an important project. There is a deal in Congress to fund government programs at current levels. That bill is expected to reach a vote later in the month, but even if approved it wouldn't help. There's no money for repairs in the short-term appropriation bill.

That omission should be fixed. Sen. Charles Schumer, D -N.Y., says funds for the dome project should be incorporated into the short-term legislation. It's a sound suggestion. Delaying vital repairs means the amount and speed of damage will increase and the eventual cost of repairs will escalate. Taxpayers deserve better.

Repairs to the dome need not be caught up in partisan gridlock. Schumer, no stranger to party-based bickering, understands that. "There is a time and place to debate federal spending and the proper role of government, but most Americans believe that when your house has a leaky roof, you pay to fix the roof." He's right. Funds for dome repairs should be approved promptly.

7
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
nucanuck said...

A deteriorating Capitol dome seems an apt metaphor for a deteriorating political apparatus housed within.

September 4, 2012 at 12:27 a.m.
EaTn said...

Brick and marble buildings are becoming more obsolete as our schools and businesses move more into the digital age. Maybe now is the time to rethink how our federal government will operate fifty or a hundred years from now. Will DC become a history museum?

September 4, 2012 at 4:03 a.m.
nucanuck said...

JonRoss, I would at least agree that Obama's presidency has been little more than a continuation of the Bush policies on wars, taxes, foreign policy, bailouts for big banks and industry. Even Bush's prescription drug bill and Obama's health care bill are similar in that they enriched large corporations.

Unfortunately, we are going to get more of the same for the next four years no matter who we vote for. Both candidates embrace the same core policies, however only one is in darkface.

September 4, 2012 at 9:59 a.m.
Rickaroo said...

Agreed, nucanuck.

This problem with the deteriorating dome is emblematic of the conservative approach to practically everything pertaining to economics. They think that the very act of cutting spending is a gesture that in itself will be enough to appease their God (who is no doubt a Rebublican and a captitalist in their minds) who will then bless us with abundant jobs and prosperity.

But no matter what, spending is going to have to continue. You cannot just stop spending and expect things to miraculously turn around. It is a matter of spending wisely, on things like infrastructure, education, job training, health care for all (which would ensure a healthy and more productive nation), and renewable forms of energy. If you stop spending on these and other vital services and programs, the neglect and lack of investment will end up costing us exponentially more in the long run. Or we will soon become a banana republic, which is what we seem to be well on our way to becoming anyway - especially if R&R get elected and have the chance to stir even more of their worn-out voo-doo economics into the mix.

September 4, 2012 at 5:48 p.m.
Rickaroo said...

Security was every bit as tight at the Republican convention, JR. It's understandable that it would be. Not sure what point you're trying to make with that comment. Just another way of your trying to make an issue out of a non-issue. Good lord, man, we have enough to disagree about as it is. No need to throw in silly inconsequential things like extra-tight security at political conventions.

Also, Obama is not a "Marxist/Progressive/fascist dog" either. You would know that if you took off your teabagging blinders. I think you've been having too many conversations with your empty chair.

September 4, 2012 at 6:35 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.