published Monday, September 24th, 2012

Stolen valor, found

What kind of person says he received the Medal of Honor, or any other military medal, when he hasn't? There's got to be a pathetic emptiness in his life for him to do such a thing. How would a real recipient of the medal feel about the fraud? Our guess is that he — or she — would feel more pity than anger.

Congress being Congress, it passed the Stolen Valor Act back in 2006. The act made it a crime to lie about receiving military medals. You know ethics are lacking in a society when laws have to take their place, and penalties are enacted in place of the kind of shame that such pathetic cases should feel.

Congress can make it a crime to lie? In that case, just imagine the indictments that could be filed against some of those who've filled congressional seats over the years. Happily, the U.S. Supreme Court recognized the futility — and blatant unconstitutionality — of such laws. The justices realized that this Stolen Valor Act violated the First Amendment, that the right to free speech includes having a few beers at the VFW and telling all the folks gathered around the bar how you fended off the Taliban in Vietnam (or was the Viet Cong in Afghanistan?) with only a Bowie knife, saving a herd of nuns in the process. In short, there is no liberty without license, no guarantee of free speech without opening the door to its abuse.

Not all speech, including lies, can be protected by the First Amendment. You may not yell "Fire!" in a crowded theater unless there really is a fire. You may not use inside information to buy or sell stocks. And you may not tell folks you'll send them a million dollars posthaste from Nigeria if they'll just supply their bank account information.

The key to deciding whether Congress can limit this kind of speech is whether it's part of a fraud. And fraud is punishable by law, thank goodness. Or as The Hon. Anthony Kennedy put it in his majority decision declaring the Stolen Valor Act I unconstitutional:

"The statute seeks to control and suppress all false statements on this one subject in almost limitless times and settings. And it does so entirely without regard to whether the lie was made for the purpose of material gain."

Makes sense. So now our Congress decided to make it illegal to benefit from telling lies about one's military decorations. On Sept. 13, the U.S. House passed legislation that would make it a crime "to obtain money, property or other tangible benefit" by lying about military medals.

Here is Tim Griffin, a congressman from Arkansas, who helped push through the legislation: "Protecting the integrity and valor of American service members who have distinguished themselves in defense of this nation is critically important. ... We must ensure that the Medal of Honor and other military awards are protected from fraud."

Even those speaking for the ACLU say this law might pass constitutional muster. And it does feel even more unseemly — if it can get more unseemly — to make money from false claims of honor.

Lying is one thing, fraud quite another.

Just a couple of questions: Aren't there already laws against fraud? Why a separate law singling out just this one? Because it makes the rest of us feel righteous — as if we'd actually accomplished something -- even though there are already enough laws on the books?

It doesn't always take an act of Congress to right a wrong. After the Supreme Court made its ruling in June, the military made some noise about setting up a database of award winners, and putting it on the Internet for all to see.

Such a website, run by the Congressional Medal of Honor Society, now exists at: There you'll find a list of all those who received the nation's highest military honor, in what conflict, and in which branch they served. Those who have received the award are listed alphabetically, or you can search for a specific name.

All of which, if you're really interested, would come in handy next time somebody at the bar is trying to impress the waitress with his fictionalized military exploits. Suggest, loudly, that somebody look up the Congressional Medal of Honor Society's website on the closest smartphone. Then watch the creep excuse himself.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
Fendrel said...

In all the "sea stores" I've listed to over the years I have NEVER heard anyone claim to have earned the Congressional Medal of Honor ... Silver stars, Bronze stars, Commendation Medals, Purple Hearts...sure every now and then. How many incidents like this have actually occurred...sounds a bit like a solution without a problem to me.

September 24, 2012 at 9:13 a.m.
fairmon said...

I agree Fendral but it sure sounds good on the campaign trail and may pick up a few votes....the motives of congress are not always pure. This legislation itself borders on fraud.

September 25, 2012 at 4:55 a.m.

Actually, the problem with the laws against fraud is that they don't necessarily cover this kind of misrepresentation, at least not to an effective degree.

That's the thing about laws, they do have to cover something before it is criminalized. And to a specific degree with a specific intent. It's one of those things about living in a system with an explicit legal code, including one that bans criminalizing things before a law is passed against it. That's why there have been laws passed in response to problems for senior citizens, doctors, and yes, even politicians, not just service members.

Besides, you got the site wrong. Yours only mentions ONE medal, with no intention to go further.

Intends to cover everything to the best of its abilities.

I guess you couldn't bring yourself to list the URL of a government website.

And no, the problem isn't solely with the Congressional Medal of Honor, not entirely, but with other, less documented awards.

September 25, 2012 at 11:30 a.m.
Lookingback said...

My goodness, we have a President who has a Nobel Prize and did absolutely nothing to deserve it. Personal responsibility has gone south as demonstrated by our Liar in Chief.

September 25, 2012 at 3:21 p.m.
jesse said...

Well it WAS after his Nobel BUT Osama is a lot more peaceful nowadays!!

September 26, 2012 at 6:40 a.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.