published Sunday, August 18th, 2013

Learn to pronounce the name of our city and other letters to the editors

Learn to pronounce the name of our city

It is funny how people are always saying if you live in this country “learn to speak English.”

We have people who live here in this city, and they cannot pronounce Chattanooga. Some have lived here over 20 years and still say Chatt-Nooga.

I understand that some of these people come from other locations, but please give this great city a little respect.

President Obama came to visit here recently, and whether you like him or not, at least he knew how to pronounce Chattanooga correctly.


Hypocrisy abounds in Rants column

I might find time to be angry if only I could stop laughing! The reader responses in the Sunday paper Aug. 11th are fraught with hypocrisies.

One ranter wrote, “The tea party has constitutional rights to assemble peacefully. That is what they did. Deal with it.”

I wonder, did this ranter take the same attitude when the Occupy movement camped out on the courthouse lawn?

Or were you crying out for their swift removal? If so, you are a hypocrite.

They were lamenting the termination of Drew Johnson. I enjoyed his articles and had no problem, even as a supporter of our president, with the headline. My problem is with the hypocrisy of the writers who lambasted the leaders of the paper for terminating him for expressing his viewpoint in an (arguably) inappropriate way, while going on to state that you should fire Clay Bennett because they find him too offensive. Hypocrisy!

Sorry, folks, you can’t have it both ways. I find Mr. Bennett’s cartoons enjoyable and poignant. The fact that he strikes such a nerve on a regular basis just tells me that he is on to something.

Sometimes the truth hurts.


Some views on local stories

Thank you, Times Free Press, for enforcing your standards of headline writing and having the courage of your convictions in firing Drew Johnson. I’m sure this was a controversial decision at the paper. It was the right one, setting and following your own rules ethically.

David Cook, your article on the cost of the crosses under construction was spot-on. Does any religious organization truly think that spending $700,000 on their particular version of

evangelicalism is better than using it for any of the purposes he listed? Providing clean water, helping the homeless and feeding the poor seem more important to me than advertising.

On another note: What is all the flap about unions at Volkswagen? How many people who have strong opinions about whether or not there should be a union there will be directly affected? The police and firefighters have unions. Football players and electricians have unions. Are they problems for the average citizen, too? The employees get to decide, and only their views matter.

Now, TFP, does a bowl of fruit on the side of Signal Mountain really warrant front-page coverage? Come on, you can do better than that. And mostly you do.


Libertarian views ruffled feathers

As a Democrat and avid fan of both editorial pages, I am grateful someone (“Strong Republican” Aug. 9) finally noted that Drew Johnson’s opinions were libertarian and thus bound to ruffle the feathers of traditional conservatives on many social issues, such as same-sex marriage, legalization of drugs, etc. I disagree with “Strong Republican” that a more flattering tone to the headline would not have led to the dismissal. The paper stated Mr. Johnson rewrote his original headline after it had been approved by his editor and noted he had written many editorials strongly critical of the president. I take the editors at their word. I do not believe, however, that this rule violation was the sole reason for the firing. The publisher surely knew what he was getting when Johnson was hired and approved the appearance of so many opinion pieces from the libertarian Cato Institute during Johnson’s tenure ( that disappeared). It is more likely that the offending headline was the last straw or excuse after a host of editorials critical of Senators Alexander and Corker for bipartisan positions, such as support for local taxation of Internet sales, as well as broadly favored local government initiatives.

A steady diet of libertarian opinions probably evoked more howls from conservatives than from liberals.


Judge meddled in name change

I am puzzled as to why a great many of Tennessee’s citizens are opposed to the NSA’s “spying” on their telephone numbers when their own court system recently intruded into a Tennessee couple’s personal business. A child-support magistrate and a judge in Newport, Tenn., each spoke against the parents’ decision to name their very own baby “Messiah.” Their choice was made because it blended well with their two other sons’ names; and in the last few years, the name was ranked between 400th and 1.000th in popularity of baby names on annual listings.

My questions are: Since when can public servants defend a name change based on their personal religious belief that this name is a title reserved solely for Jesus? Is a judge

meddling when she bases her legal decision on her personal opinion that, one day in the future, a child with the name Messiah “could put him at odds with a lot of people.” Is she also a fortune teller? Has there ever been a problem with the name Jesus, a popular moniker for boys? What about Mary for girls? What about “Virgin” as in the airline? Ponder that!


It’s OK to set aside partisan politics

Recently Jim Hall wrote a very informative article regarding several issues of great importance to all Americans.

One could agree or disagree regarding his assessment of how our government functions.

I know Jim to be what I would consider a moderate Democrat.

As he knows, I am a moderate-learning Republican. Yet Mr. Hall lays aside partisan politics to be openly critical and objective about our current administration.

Far too long we have had the opinion we must remain steadfastly loyal to our chosen party and overlook the truth on subjects that should be closely scrutinized. Mr. Hall is doing

what so many of both parties try to avoid: being objective.

When we turn a blind eye at the actions or lack of within any government agency, that should transcend party loyalty, and I am proud to say Mr. Hall has done so.

In all too many cases we fail to speak out simply because we feel it will fall on deaf ears and do no good. But if we all sit on our hands and never speak out about anything of which we are in disagreement, then those in charge will have their way with us. And then we deserve the consequences.

W. LANNY McNABB, Signal Mountain

Crosses provide bold proclamation

David Cook’s commentary on the expense of giant crosses, and his ideas for better use of the money was interesting.

I don’t know the hearts of those at The Crossing Church inspired to build these crosses, or how God will use them, but I know the cross is a beacon of hope, the symbol of Christian

faith. It symbolizes the love of God in offering salvation through faith in Christ’s death and resurrection. Dr. Michael Youssef, in his book, “When the Crosses Are Gone: Restoring Sanity to a World Gone Mad,” writes that we’re “a culture increasingly hostile to the cross. By increments, we’re departing from the truth.

The cross of Christ is the greatest expression in history of one love for all people.”

God’s heart for the poor is evident in the Bible. Jesus’ story of the good Samaritan exemplifies true Christian love. Compassionate, seeking to meet physical and spiritual needs of others. As important as physical needs are, spiritual needs are greater, deeper and eternal. As we pass by the crosses, remember the message, “You need a Savior.”

Hallelujah for this bold proclamation and witness to God’s saving grace and the power of the cross! Glory to God!


Crosses can help some turn to Jesus

David Cook, in an article on Aug. 9, wrote of all the things the money spent for three crosses at the Crossings Church.

I read of another man who talked the same way in the Bible. His name was Judas Iscariot. When Mary anointed Jesus’s feet with the costly ointment, Judas said the ointment

could have been sold for 300 pence and given to the poor.

Jesus said. “Let her alone, the poor ye have with you always.”

Jesus also said in Mark 9:36, “What shall it profit a man if he shall gain the whole world and lose his own soul.” If one person with a troubled soul sees those crosses, realizes there is hope in Jesus, and is saved from going to hell for eternity, that is worth more than the whole world. I pray that many troubled souls will see those crosses and turn to Jesus for salvation or help in time of trouble.


Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
daytonsdarwin said...

Margret Tanner wrote:"If one person with a troubled soul sees those crosses, realizes there is hope in Jesus, and is saved from going to hell for eternity, that is worth more than the whole world. I pray that many troubled souls will see those crosses and turn to Jesus for salvation or help in time of trouble."

Or turn in to Sunday TV where faith-healers will be scamming the religious gullible out of money while pretending to remove demons and disease by slapping people on the forehead. Why? So the preachers can build bigger churches and crosses to attract more gullible people. What expresses God's love better than piles of cash, giant crosses, and churches that look like Los Vegas hotels?

There's nothing like a religious racket and Ponzi scheme to bring in the mentally destitute, superstitious, and scientific illiterate.

"There's a sucker born every minute — half of them are born again."

August 18, 2013 at 12:12 a.m.
Rickaroo said...

No, Louise Roseberry, I do not "need a savior," thank you. I'm just fine as I am. I'm not perfect and never will be but I am as God (to use the only word that you Christians seem to be able to relate to when it comes to matters of the unknown) made me, and if that's not good enough, well, that's his problem, not mine. And if your God has some screwy notion that I need to be washed in the blood of his virgin-born sacrificial self to be made perfect, then that is some whack-job of a deity you choose to worship and I prefer to have nothing to do with such a twisted sado-masochistic monster. Maybe you get all weepy-eyed with emotion when you see those crosses but I'd much rather see the clear patch of sky that those ugly tacky hunks of metal are now obscuring.

August 18, 2013 at 12:50 a.m.

Saint Matthew 10:32-33

"Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven. But whosoever shall deny Me before men, him will I also deny before My Father which is in heaven."

Jesus Christ, The Lion of The Tribe of Judah said,

"And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear Him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell...into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched: where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched."

The Angel of The Lord God of Hosts says,

"...the same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of His indignation; and he (rebels against Jesus) shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: and the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night..."

August 18, 2013 at 8:40 a.m.
daytonsdarwin said...

Orr is consumed with imaginary boogeymen living in his head. His belief in a murderous, paranoid-schizophrenic monster-diety causes him to utter nonsensical quotes from a manmade and poorly written book of fiction.

If only Orr could spout something of more importance than the man-made superstitious trivialities of illiterate ancient goat herders.

Poor Orr. Lost on Gawd's Gilligan's Island, there is no chance of rescue from his self-induced religious insanity, still waiting for the Skipper in the Sky that never existed except in the minds of the gullible.

Surrounded by lifeboats of reason, Gilligan Orr waits for the Holy Spook to ferry him to heaven's shore to kiss the ring of an imaginary and evil boogeyman.

This is why Orr's Creationism is not to be taught as science, history, or hope for humanity.

August 18, 2013 at 9:31 a.m.
Rickaroo said...

But Ms. Fielding, there's a world of difference between those mild-mannered, courteous, patriotic, nicely dressed Tea Party people and those dirty old hippies in the Occupy movement. Why, haven't you heard? They urinated, defecated, regurgitated, and ejaculated all over the place. Plus, they smelled bad! My goodness, they just weren't nice at all. Obviously they need to take a lesson from those good Tea Party folks on the etiquette of protesting. Yes'm those Tea Party folks are the real deal, the true blue Amurikans. Those Occupy deadbeats are just, you know, communists and such.

August 18, 2013 at 10:43 a.m.
Rickaroo said...

Ah, Mr. Orr, what would we heathens do without you holy rollers firing off a few of those hellfire and brimstone verses from your holy book that put the fear of the wrath of your sadistic (but "loving") God into us? Yes sir, you have certainly given me pause to reflect upon my heinous and reckless actions of... daring to think for myself. And the more I think about it, the more silly and incomprehensible your God looks to me, for being so petty and jealous and vindictive in DEMANDING that we love and obey only him and not be allowed to think for ourselves and choose what philosophy suits us best in this life. Your God gave us humans the natural instinct to be curious and inquisitive and to seek out the truth in all things, yet he demands that we not exercise that God-given part of our minds but simply OBEY his commands. Don't you find that rather odd? I always like to hear how you Christians say that God has given us the free will to choose, but then when we don't choose the one and only way that he COMMANDS that we believe, it's a one-way ticket to hell. Some free will there!

Nah, Mr. Orr. Thanks but no thanks. I find your verses laughable at best. I will leave it to you and your zombified flock of obedient little Christian brothers and sisters to fear the imaginary hell of your imaginary God. As for me personally, I have far better things to THINK about and devote my time to than such silly and childish fears and wasteful, negative imaginings.

August 18, 2013 at 11:49 a.m.

Jesus Christ knows that when we glorify Him it releases an enormous amount of majestic blessings into our lives. This is indeed love. It is altruistic and not selfish.

If we choose to attempt to change His truth into a lie, then this is in effect attempting to change reality. He cannot any more tolerate this than an oncologist can tolerate cancer cells. In fact this person who denies Jesus Christ is akin to a cancer cell which must be radiated/burned off in order to protect the otherwise healthy body.


August 19, 2013 at 5:49 a.m.
daytonsdarwin said...

Now Orr claims special medical knowledge. Still waiting for your scientific credentials you promised 18 months ago.

And reading a Jack Chick Bible pamphlet doesn't count as credentials.

For those of you not familiar with Chick Bible tracts, read 'em and laugh.

August 19, 2013 at 10:29 a.m.
Rickaroo said...

Ken Orr, you clearly have a mind that functions at the level of about a 10 yr. old. Anyone older than that, if not already brainwashed into your fundamentalist superstitious Christian garbage, would have the sense to see how ridiculous the "reality" of your fairy tale book is.

Those "cancer cells" of which you speak are not people who deny Jesus. (We are quite whole and healthy, thank you). They are the Bible thumping Christian yahoos like you and con-man and madman Lohr who go around preaching your insane, primitive beliefs. It's bad enough that this cancer inflicts you but you're intent on spreading it to innocent children and corrupting their minds to such an extent that many of them are never able to recover their wits and become whole of mind again. And then they keep spreading the lies and the idiocy, ad infinitum, ad nauseum.

Yes, there is a cancer among us, Mr. Orr. It is the cancer of willful ignorance and arrogant self-righteousness. Oh, beg pardon, it is not self-righteousness, is it? It is "altruistic" love. Washed in the blood, right? Lordy, we all know it can't be real love unless it comes from the blood sacrifice of a God who just has a thing for blood sacrifice. Praise Jeezus and halleelooya.

August 19, 2013 at 12:52 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.