published Friday, July 12th, 2013

Medicaid expansion bleeds because of partisan politics

Sometimes when numbers don't add up, the reason is just error. Sometimes when one plus one isn't two, the reason is more insidious.

In the case of Tennessee's continuing rejection of the federal offer to cover all the cost of expanding TennCare/Medicaid for three years and 90 percent of it thereafter, the bottom line -- throwing away free money -- seems simply to be partisan obstructionism.

This week, Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam and his TennCare chief Darin Gordon said they reviewed the final federal rules on the Medicaid expansion, a part of President Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act, and they still aren't happy with it.

Why? Because their "early read" indicates it doesn't provide the "flexibility" the governor wants on "cost-sharing for enrollees."

Translation: Haslam has a "Tennessee plan" in which he wants to use the additional federal money intended for the Medicaid expansion to buy these adults' way onto the federal health care exchanges where the uninsured can purchase private insurance.

What difference can it make whether these 180,000-plus poor and uninsured Tennessee workers are added to TennCare or the so-called federal health care exchanges? Both are subsidized insurance managed by private insurance companies. One is under the state umbrella and one is under a federal umbrella, but both are paid for largely with federal tax money managed by states.

The difference for Haslam may be a real effort toward compromise -- or it may just be a cover. He knows his fellow Republicans in the GOP-led state legislature will balk at accepting Obamacare money for the Medicaid expansion.

Other Tennessee leaders in Congress, Sen. Lamar Alexander and Sen. Bob Corker, both dismissed the final Obamacare rules, too. Rather than work toward compromise, they called on the president to permanently delay the implementation of the entire health care law, not just delay the implementation of the employer mandate, as was announced by the Obama Administration last week.

The partisan baloney is not just hurting those poor people who have no insurance and therefore very poor health care -- people whose incomes range up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level. The spiteful gridlock also hurts everyone else and the country.

The hidden cost of care for the uninsured, regardless of their income, is enormous. That's because indigent care is commonly provided in the most expensive setting, an emergency room; and because other costs for uninsured families commonly become unrecoverable debt. The bulk of these costs is shifted directly on to the premiums paid by the rest of us -- the insured and their employers.

These shifted costs are higher than the price for preventive care for the poor under Medicaid, and higher than the cost of the insurance subsidies that will soon be available for other working families under the insurance exchanges.

In Hamilton County, Families USA estimates, 29,760 workers and families will receive wage-adjusted subsidies and tax credits designed to make quality health insurance affordable under the Affordable Care Act.

If Haslam and the Legislature's Republican majority continue to resist the Medicaid expansion, they will hurt all Tennesseans.

Those uninsured people will not miraculously cease to be sick or injured. They will still go to emergency rooms all over the state. Many Tennessee hospitals, especially rural ones, also will suffer, and some may close because federal reimbursements to hospitals nationwide are cut. In most states that won't matter, because more insured people means more hospital bills paid.

There's more fallout: In rural areas, hospitals are major employers, and where a hospital closes, it will be hard to make up for those lost jobs: What companies would think about locating in a place with no nearby emergency care?

Without opting into the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion, Tennessee will not have the benefit of additional federal dollars or more insured people to pay hospital bills -- all because the Tennessee General Assembly -- and perhaps the governor -- chose not to compromise on an already sweet deal.

Who's the loser? Not Obama. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is law. The loser will be Tennessee if we forfeit the benefit of extra federal dollars and better health care for all Tennesseans.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
conservative said...

I like this new far leftist/Liberal/Socialist/Demoncrat writer a lot better than the old one simply because I often don't have to read past the caption to know where the writer is going or at the most a few sentences thereafter.

The first short paragraph was something about math.

I had to go no further than the third sentence of the piece to read the criticism by the writer that Tennessee is refusing to accept FREE federal money.

Tennessee is refusing to accept FREE federal money.

Think about that.

Tennessee is refusing to accept FREE federal money.

Think about that. The Feds want to give Tennessee FREE money.

Tennessee is refusing to accept FREE federal money.

Think about that. Is federal money FREE?

Tennessee is refusing to accept FREE federal money.

Think about that. Where do the Feds get this FREE money?

Think about that.

Think about that.

One word best sums up Leftist/Liberal/Socialist/Demoncrat thinking.

Think about what that word might be.

July 12, 2013 at 7:11 a.m.
LaughingBoy said...

Those were my thoughts exactly, and they came early into the opinion, too. I think this well educated lady "gets it" but doesn't care about fund sources.

July 12, 2013 at 12:20 p.m.
fairmon said...


o 26 million are exempt from the ACHA law and more to come. Wonder why that many would request and be granted an exemption?

o What is the real reason for postponing the employer mandate?

o Where does the "free money" come from? Borrow, print, the money tree or from you and me?

o What is wrong with the governor of Tennessee wanting reasonable flexibility in a program in order to utilize money for the people in Tennessee?

o Is most of the "free money" that is not new federal debt is paid in by Tennessee tax payers.

The ACHA was passed on the fast track which is usually a head long rush to a disaster. The ACA is no exception, the objective is good but the input is terrible and will yield poor results. Once the governor sells Tennessee's soul and accepts federal control there is no turning back. Most people realize that the AHCA will, like most federal programs, be poorly managed and very expensive.

July 14, 2013 at 8:26 a.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.