published Wednesday, March 6th, 2013

A more conservative council and a mayor without a plan

  • photo
    Campaign signs line East Brainerd Road in front of the polling place at Concord Baptist Church as voting takes place Tuesday in Chattanooga's municipal election.
    Photo by John Rawlston /Chattanooga Times Free Press.

On Tuesday night, the long, slow slog towards the inevitable finally ended. Andy Berke is officially the mayor-elect of Chattanooga.

For the sake of the city, we hope Berke is a great leader for Chattanooga. In reality, though, we simply have no idea what kind of mayor he will be. What he has told Chattanoogans about specific policies he wants to enact couldn't fill a thimble. And that's scary, because he'll probably be Chattanooga's mayor for a long, long time.

As much as Berke might like to leverage his mayoral post into a successful bid for governor or U.S. senator, a Democrat has about as much chance of winning a statewide race in Tennessee as Gary Busey has of winning "All-Star Celebrity Apprentice."

We really only know one thing about Berke for sure: He is not Ron Littlefield. When the new mayor's biggest selling point is that he's not the big-spending, crony-protecting failure Chattanooga has had in the mayor's office for the last eight years, that isn't saying much.

As voters, Chattanoogans just bought a pig in a poke. There's nothing left to do now except hope for the best.

Chattanooga's hanging chad

The most stunning outcome of Tuesday's election wasn't an outcome at all. At least not yet, anyway. In the District 9 contest between incumbent Peter Murphy and former council member Yusuf Hakeem, neither man won -- and they were the only two people running.

Chattanooga election law requires that a candidate receive a majority of the votes cast or face the next highest vote-earner in an April runoff election. Hakeem wound up with 49.98 percent of the vote -- just one single vote shy of winning. Murphy, for his part, earned only six fewer votes than Hakeem. Seven voters cast write-in votes. If just two of them had just not voted, or one of them had voted for Hakeem, Hakeem would be the winner.

Because the election commission has an unknown number of provisional ballots to consider in the coming days, it's possible that either Hakeem or Murphy will end up with over 50 percent of the vote and a runoff won't be necessary.

For now, however, the real stars of the election are the seven people who wrote-in "Homer Simpson" or "Howard Stern" to be funny or to prove a point. Those seven people could dramatically impact the outcome of the election.

No incumbency advantage this time

Three incumbents were defeated handily on Tuesday. Two more -- Murphy and Jack Benson -- are could easily lose in runoffs. Only two of the nine current council members are assured of returning.

As a principled small government conservative, Ken Smith, who beat Pam Ladd in District 4, will make a fine addition to the council. In District 7, Chris Anderson bested incumbent Manny Rico by 300 votes after Rico became unhinged in the final days of the race, attacking Anderson's sexuality and claiming anti-Latino sentiment in the media.

For conservatives, Moses Freeman's dominating win over District 8 incumbent AndraƩ McGary might be the most disappointing result in an otherwise encouraging night.

Districts 1, 3 and 7 will all have more fiscally responsible city council members in the wake of the elections of Chip Henderson, Smith and Anderson. District 4 will join that list if Larry Grohn wins the runoff over Benson.

Pitiful turnout ... as predicted

As expected, voter turnout was pathetic. In a city of more than 170,000 residents, only 18,194 showed up to vote -- a shameful 16.3 percent of registered voters.

If Election Day 2013 proved anything, it's that Chattanooga city elections should be moved to coincide with the August and November elections during a presidential election year, so that turnout will be 60 or 70 percent, rather than less than 20 percent.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
AndrewLohr said...

Yeah, move the election date; one election is cheaper than two. (If more votes had been cast four years ago, it would've been harder to get enough signatures to recall Mayor Littlefield as he deserved.) But there's this to be said for low turnout: the election isn't widely felt to be hugely important. When the Nazis were running against the Communists in the Wiemar Republic, turnout was high because the platform of each was to exterminate the other. That was not good.

March 6, 2013 at 6:12 a.m.
aae1049 said...

Yes, move the city election to the state/county election in August, save money, get higher voter turnout, and a government representative of the people. Let's do it. The city council will deny, like they did before. What we need to do, is go to the election commission, petition, put is on referendum. It will be alot of work. 15 percent or so of registered signatures of registered voters would be required.

March 6, 2013 at 9:57 a.m.
gjuster said...

Interesting in District 4 - Larry Grohn would be an excellent addition to the council

March 6, 2013 at 3:41 p.m.
MasterChefLen said...

Mayor Ron Littlefield's buddy Jack Benson (Mr. Annexation himself) is in the runoff election. Hopefully, the other District 4 candidates supporters will support Larry Grohn's supporters in the runoff election to put Fat Cat Jack out of office.

March 7, 2013 at 12:19 a.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.