published Saturday, June 21st, 2014

Gardenhire: Judicial action deserves scrutiny

By Todd Gardenhire

Two months from now, voters across Tennessee will be asked to vote whether or not to keep three incumbent justices on the state Supreme Court. It's a serious decision, and yet it appears there has been a concerted effort in Nashville to keep voters from learning about a potentially serious breach of judicial ethics by one of those three candidates.

Last fall, when the Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission (JPEC) was looking at whether to recommend voters retain or oust various appellate judges who were seeking another team, Chief Justice Gary Wade took great offense when the JPEC initially decided three appellate judges did not deserve the commission's recommendation.

In comments reported by the Knoxville News Sentinel, Wade essentially endorsed the three candidates. That's a no-no, as the state's Code of Judicial Conduct forbids sitting judges like Wade from making political endorsements.

The JPEC itself took note of Wade's ethics violation in its review of his performance as a judge. And while it ultimately recommended Wade get another term, it pointedly criticized him, noting that, "Canon 4.1 of the Code of Judicial Conduct admonishes judges to not 'publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for any public office,' and adding that members of the commission "were troubled by published statements attributed to the chief justice which, if accurate, amounted to active endorsement and public lobbying of this Commission ..."

There is little doubt Justice Wade violated the Code of Judicial Conduct when he told the media that three judges receiving preliminary negative recommendations should be retained. But when another state board, the Board of Judicial Conduct (BJC), was asked to investigate, it promptly exonerated Wade, saying the candidates he endorsed were not actually candidates yet.

But that is not true. When incumbent judges sign the required "Notice of Intent" forms and enter the evaluation process, they are considered candidates for office, even though the ballots haven't yet been printed. As both the JPEC and the BJC said, if they were candidates when Wade issued his endorsements, then those endorsements would indeed be a violation of the ethics rules.

Why the BJC played defense for Wade, twisting words and conjuring up technicalities in order to exonerate him, is a mystery.

While this may all seem like inside baseball to a lot of readers, it's a serious matter that should be fully investigated. The JPEC is supposed to represent the people of Tennessee in the judicial selection process, serving as their eyes and ears in order that voters may be fully informed about whether judges on the ballot are doing their job well enough to get another eight-year term.

Wade and other judges lobbying the JPEC rob that body of the independence necessary for it to do its job properly -- and such lobbying also violates Supreme Court rules. And the Board of Judicial Conduct, by swiftly dismissing the complaint against Wade, has given the public cause to worry that this agency has become a defender of those it is supposed to oversee.

If the Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission's independence is compromised and the Board of Judicial Conduct won't do its job, it is our responsibility as legislators to stand up for the right of Tennesseans to have an ethical judiciary that doesn't see itself as being above the law.

Sen. Todd Gardenhire, R-Chattanooga, represents Tennessee's 10th District, which includes Bradley County and a portion of Hamilton County. He is a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Senate Education Committee and the Senate Energy, Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
John_Proctor said...

Let me translate these comments into English from Ramseyspeak.

“Ron Ramsey wants to punish the TN Supreme Court because Bob Cooper is the state attorney general and conducts an independent office not beholden to him or the interests he represents. The court is collateral damage in the fight to oust Cooper. However, the plus side is we can axe 3 Bredesen appointees and replace them with partisan judges beholden to our interests. The “investigation” Bell and I are cooking up will throw up enough of a smokescreen that low information voters can be easily swayed to vote them out of office. The Board of Judicial Conduct, which Ramsey had a hand in appointing, wouldn’t go along with our game so this is our end run around them.”

This “investigation” is simply a charade. If anyone is “twisting words and conjuring up technicalities” it is Speaker Ramsey and his henchmen who cannot stomach the idea of an independent judiciary that does not do their bidding. The JPEC did their job fairly and honestly but Ramsey can’t stomach the result.

Read the truth about Ramsey’s power grab.


June 22, 2014 at 9:25 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.